>>9205146

L/B

I followed the birth certificate issue very closely in 2008, and still have the original PDF file that was released by the govt. as 'proof'. There has always been a bit of GAME THEORY with the release of this document, allow me to explain:

As a graphics professional, I can tell you this document obviously does not stand up to serious scrutiny. We are meant to believe the official story that a staffer scanned the original document to put it online, and all the anomalies we see are from either Optical Character Recognition, or digital / compression artifacts.

This explanation has been disproven 100 different ways, but the key is....IT IS ENOUGH FOR THE MASSES. The sheep who don't understand anything about the technical side of the image, want any kind of reason to believe the document. So the OCR explanation is enough, which now gets passed on to Snopes as 'research'.

We are therefor left to ask: If there was a real original document, why wasn't a high-quality pixel scan used instead? This would have withstood much higher levels of scrutiny, and subsequently had the endorsement of graphics pros, and been much more convincing. There could have still been some nit-picky arguments, but this kind of image would have been much more of a rock-solid proof.

So the 'original' document either 1) doesn't exist, 2) has a high quality scan somewhere that has not been released, or 3) was a paper forgery that would NOT have withstood the scrutiny of a high quality scan.

The digital representation officially released, therefore, has two purposes:

1) to placate the masses with a thinly plausible 'proof'

2) to serve as a slap in the face to those who know its a fake

Once again, the DeepState puts it right in front of us, knowing there is not a damn thing we can do about it. Their false narrative is part of the false digital trail of history, making anyone who doubts it a conspiracy theorist.