Anonymous ID: 50a51b May 16, 2020, 9:21 p.m. No.9207246   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7260 >>7355 >>7539 >>7577 >>7711 >>7743

Grassley demands Trump answer for firing State Department watchdog who 'failed' in Steele dossier inquiry

 

A top Republican senator demanded a deeper explanation from President Trump about his removal of the State Department watchdog while criticizing the ousted inspector general over a flawed investigation into British ex-spy Christopher Steele’s dossier. Sen. Chuck Grassley, the chairman of the Finance Committee with a long-running reputation for defending inspectors general, said Trump’s stated reasons for tossing State Department Inspector General Steve Linick on Friday were unsatisfactory even if the Iowa Republican himself had problems with the watchdog’s inquiry into the role the State Department played in the Trump-Russia saga. “Here again, inspectors general are crucial in correcting government failures and promoting the accountability that the American people deserve,” Grassley said on Saturday. “Although he failed to fully evaluate the State Department’s role in advancing the debunked Russian collusion investigation, those shortcomings do not waive the President’s responsibility to provide details to Congress when removing an IG. As I’ve said before, Congress requires written reasons justifying an IG’s removal. A general lack of confidence simply is not sufficient detail to satisfy Congress.”

 

Grassley, along with Sen. Ron Johnson of Wisconsin, sent a two-page letter to Linick in September, questioning the watchdog’s decision-making in his inquiry into a key October 2016 meeting between Steele and top State Department officials. Grassley and Johnson pointed to Linick’s failure to talk to former Deputy Assistant Secretary of State Kathleen Kavalec, who took notes, and former Special Envoy Jonathan Winer, who organized the meeting. Linick also did not speak with former Assistant Secretary of State Victoria Nuland, who received Steele’s meeting request and who Kavalec believed Steele wanted to meet with in his broader effort to disseminate the dossier’s findings. Kavalec knew by October 2016 that portions of Steele’s dossier were inaccurate, and Winer and Nuland were involved in spreading Steele's information within the U.S. government. The Republican senators said their staffs were briefed by Linick and learned the watchdog reviewed whether State Department employees violated the Hatch Act and whether Winer broke classified information protocols. “The briefing also disclosed that the [inspector general] determined that a State Department employee may have engaged in anti-Trump political conduct in violation of the Hatch Act and referred that individual to the Office of Special Counsel for investigation,” Johnson and Grassley wrote. “Despite this recommendation, however, the [inspector general] did not publish a written report about its review.” A Republican Senate staffer told the Washington Examiner on Saturday that Linick followed up on the September letter by providing another briefing, and said “the explanation we received was that State IG was deferring to DOJ IG — but some of the characters involved were in State's jurisdiction.”

 

DOJ inspector general Michael Horowitz said in his December report on the FBI's Russia investigation that two witnesses, Fusion GPS co-founder Glenn Simpson and Winer, both “declined our requests for voluntary interviews, and we were unable to compel their testimony.” Horowitz criticized the Justice Department and the FBI for at least 17 “significant errors and omissions” related to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act warrants against former Trump campaign adviser Carter Page and for the bureau's reliance on Steele’s salacious and flawed dossier. Declassified footnotes show the FBI knew Steele's dossier may have been compromised by Russian disinformation. Linick’s abrupt removal on Friday, which is effective within 30 days, was troubling to another Republican: Sen. Mitt Romney of Utah. “The firings of multiple Inspectors General is unprecedented; doing so without good cause chills the independence essential to their purpose," he tweeted Saturday.

 

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/grassley-demands-trump-answer-for-firing-state-department-watchdog-who-failed-in-steele-dossier-inquiry

https://www.hsgac.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/2019-09-12%20RHJ,%20CEG%20to%20State%20OIG%20re%20Christopher%20Steele%20Meeting.pdf

Anonymous ID: 50a51b May 16, 2020, 9:43 p.m. No.9207420   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>9207355

I'm not so sure we can leave Ron Johnson out of the equation either. He also signed the letter, it's not unusual for Grassley to send these letters on his own. Why didn't he get any other R's to sign off on this..

Anonymous ID: 50a51b May 16, 2020, 10:01 p.m. No.9207562   🗄️.is 🔗kun

\>>9207491

 

 

 

>That is why Anons cannot call themselves patriots

>

>If they do not make their opinions known to their elected representatives

>

>Or file court actions to enforce their rights

>

>Just sitting around complaining is a form of PASSIVE SEDITIOUS CONSPIRACY and makes Anons guilty of consenting to rape by the Globalist NWO.

 

Hmmm, You are here what does that fact make you guilty of ..and what you seem to be suggesting, Is not necessary, Anon's function here as digital warriors serve a very important purpose, of waking up the MASSES, having them look to other alternatives for their news other than MSM.. and waking up they are. They are finally starting to see the stories that have been pushed are nothing moar than lies. Important first step in recovery. What do you call YOURSELF?