>>10188522

(Please read from the start)

“Itzam Cab Ain is believed to be his terrestrial aspect, meaning “Cayman of Earth Itzam” and assumes a prominent role in the narratives of creation in maya mythology, The gods used its body to make the earth after killing it. The myth begins with a cataclysm caused by the saurian after vomiting the fluid that floods the earth. Then, the gods decapitate the reptile to stop the flood. Later, the body of the lizard falls on the earth and on its four corners are placed the four world trees to raise and hold the sky that had collapsed.”

>> Notable: “hold the sky that had collapsed”.

“Principal Bird Deity

From the Late Postclassic Paris Codex back in time to the Pre-Classic San Bartolo murals, god D (Itzamna) has the so-called Principal Bird Deity - perhaps the Yaxcocahmut mentioned above - for a transformative shape (see figure). The bird often holds a bicephalous snake in its beak. Its head sometimes resembles that of a rain deity; at other times, it is more like that of a bird of prey, perhaps the laughing falcon believed to be a harbinger of rain.[6] The wings are repeatedly inscribed with the signs for "daylight" and "night", suggesting that the bird's flight could represent the unfolding of time. The San Bartolo murals have a Principal Bird Deity seated on top of each of four world trees, recalling the four world trees (together with a fifth, central tree) which, according to some of the early-colonial Chilam Balam books, were re-erected after the collapse of the sky. These world trees were associated with specific birds. Four world trees also appear in the Mexican Borgia Codex. The shooting of the Principal Bird deity is one of the main episodes of the Classic Period Hero Twins myth; but strong arguments plead against the Principal Bird Deity's equation with Vucub Caquix, a bird demon shot by the Popol Vuh Twins.”

>> Birds can also be referring to the ability to FLY/FLIGHT, not just the animal (like the Saqqara bird). And as his name “might” suggest, Itzamna is connected to fertility = rain and crops. The concept of “daylight” and “night” reminds of me Ra’s trip during the day and his battle with Apep in the underworld during the night. Take note: the bicephalic snake; and WORLD TREES: “recalling the four world trees (together with the fifth, central tree)”.

So we have, AGAIN, the snake, the tree, the flood (like in the Epic of Gilgamesh – page 37) = all linked to a higher creator god of humans, teaching mankind any WISE and useful stuff like writing.

“Human representatives

God D and his avian transformation could be represented by human beings. Various kings of Yaxchilan, Dos Pilas, and Naranjo had Itzamnaaj as part of their names or titles. On Palenque's Temple XIX platform, a dignitary presenting the king with his royal headband wears the Principal Bird Deity's headdress, while being referred to as Itzamnaaj. In his bird avatar, god D here appears as the creator god bestowing rulership on a king.”

>> I just noticed something anons: the bird headdress or the bird headband of the Mayans, it reminds me of the iconography of Ra = human body with head of bird – and the supposed deity/aliens of the Annunaki with human body and head + wings of a bird. What about the Masks the Dogon people wear? Are we dealing with the same concept here?

• Page 249 –

>>10199086

(Please read from the start)

Since the Mayan myths/stories didn’t come down to us directly (very few did), but some were “reconstructed” while others were transmitted from Spanish observation and writings about them; we should check for archeological artifacts. I keep on telling anons that the text should match the archaeological artifact and not the artifact should match the text, and this case is no exception.

After looking, I found this relief taken fromTikal and it was in the Berlin Museum. It is reported that it was “destroyed” during WWII. How convenient! It’s just how ISIS destroyed the artifacts, sculptors and monuments in Iraq and Syria. Gives you the impression someone was trying to “erase” evidence, or pretend it’s gone while they hoard them (((themselves))).

Upon examination, we can see: Itzamna in a “CORACLE” rowing (compare with coracle – pages 15 to 17). He is wearing headband with feathers on it (Hunter palette – page 115), which some believe it’s the headset of a “feathered” serpent. The entire landscape is covered with water, apart what seem to be only the “cone” of a volcano in full eruption. Right in front of the coracle, there is a person, either dead or drowning; as well as “fish”. From Mayan glyphs we know that “island” (supposedly) was situated in the EAST.

This is very very interesting, isn’t it anons? Remember that Mt Ararat is a volcano; the Armenians used coracles = kuphars; and Noah’s Ark (= survivors) “landed” on Mt Ararat (Pages 25-26). Anyone apart me see the similarities? Combine the fossils on the terrain around the Ark and all the fossils we see in the countries around the Med Sea (pages 218 to 224) along with this relief. The pieces are coming together in a perfect fit. In page 226, I talked about the land splitting between Africa and the Middle East (the Great Rift) that created the Red Sea; which meant Earthquakes….and I noticed many volcanoes scattered along that rift, which we can assume were erupting if there was a massive earthquake that created the rift. And in this relief, we can see the volcano in the background in full eruption. Again, the pieces are getting together and fitting perfectly. Last point: in the Epic of Gilgamesh as well as the Flood myth in Mesoamerica mention the death of many people because of the Flood = represented on the relief.

In a parallel note: Gucumatz or Kulkukan, is some sort of a feathered snake, whom along with Tepeu created the world.

• Page 250 –