>>11766090

(Please read from the start)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Viracocha

“Viracocha is the great creator deity in the pre-Inca and Inca mythology in the Andes region of South America. Full name and some spelling alternatives are Wiracocha, Apu Qun Tiqsi Wiraqutra, and Con-Tici (also spelled Kon-Tiki, the source of the name of Thor Heyerdahl's raft). Viracocha was one of the most important deities in the Inca pantheon and seen as the creator of all things, or the substance from which all things are created, and intimately associated with the sea.”

>> I’m not surprised to find out he is intimately associated with the sea since I strongly think he came from the sea…sort of speak.

“Viracocha created the universe, sun, moon, and stars, time (by commanding the sun to move over the sky)[3] and civilization itself. Viracocha was worshipped as god of the sun and of storms. He was represented as wearing the sun for a crown, with thunderbolts in his hands, and tears descending from his eyes as rain. In accord with the Inca cosmogony, Viracocha may be assimilated to Saturn, the "old god", the maker of time or "deus faber" (god maker), corresponding to the visible planet with the longest revolution around the sun.”

>> Well, I don’t know if he is or not assimilated to Saturn, but all his attributes and characteristics are very similar to a celestial deity, mostly Zeus. Those thunderbolts in his hands, you think they come from some sort of weapon he was carrying or even wearing as a hand bracelet (like Ra bracelet in Stargate movie – page 206)?

“Cosmogony according to Spanish accounts

According to a myth recorded by Juan de Betanzos, Viracocha rose from Lake Titicaca (or sometimes the cave of Paqariq Tampu) during the time of darkness to bring forth light. He made the sun, moon, and the stars. He made mankind by breathing into stones, but his first creation were brainless giants that displeased him. So he destroyed it with a flood and made a new, better one from smaller stones.”

>> So his first try to create humans ended up with having brainless GIANTS which he destroyed with a FLOOD. It’s also important to note that he brought light to the world by creating the stars etc, just like what we have in the Old Testament = the world was in darkness and then, there was light – sure maybe the method of creating that light is different, but the idea is the same.

“Viracocha eventually disappeared across the Pacific Ocean (by walking on the water), and never returned. He wandered the earth disguised as a beggar, teaching his new creations the basics of civilization, as well as working numerous miracles. He wept when he saw the plight of the creatures he had created. It was thought that Viracocha would re-appear in times of trouble. Pedro Sarmiento de Gamboa wrote that Viracocha was described as "a man of medium height, white and dressed in a white robe like an alb secured round the waist and that he carried a staff and a book in his hands.”

>> Very interesting description isn’t it anons? The description reminds of that of Jesus Christ and even the “powers” this Inca deity had = like walking on water, are identical of Jesus. You shouldn’t think it’s odd, in fact, this fits perfectly to where I’ve reached with my thoughts about this. Viracocha is not Jesus, but I think they are both linked.

We also saw a similar deity with the Muisca civilization in the god called Bochica (page 325 – his ressemblance to Viracocha is mentioned). Apart the physical ressemblance to our Inca/Tiwanaku god, Bochica, also carried a staff and “traveled” around and taught people his knowledge. He also caused a Flood on the Muisca as a punishment for foresaking his teachings. We have the same idea as well in the Old Testament with Noah’s story. It’s interesting isn’t it anons?

• Page 507 –

>>11778728

(Please read from the start)

“In one legend he had one son, Inti, and two daughters, Mama Killa and Pachamama. In this legend, he destroyed the people around Lake Titicaca with a Great Flood called Unu Pachakuti, lasting 60 days and 60 nights, saving two to bring civilization to the rest of the world. These two beings are Manco Cápac, the son of Inti (sometimes taken as the son of Viracocha), which name means "splendid foundation", and Mama Uqllu, which means "mother fertility". These two founded the Inca civilization carrying a golden staff, called 'tapac-yauri'. In another legend, he fathered the first eight civilized human beings. In some stories, he has a wife called Mama Qucha.”

>> With Noah, if I remember correctly, the rain = the floading, lasted 6 days and 6 night. But over here, it last 60 days and 60 nights, not 6. Usually a zero is omited or added in old times when they used to copy parchemints by mistake due to fatigue or not seeing correctly the writing. So let me ask a question: who was copying from an ancient text the story? The Incas who wrote about Viracocha? Or the Jews who wrote the story of Noah? I think both. I think the Incas copied and adopted the text from the Tiwanaku records. And it’s common knowledge = a FACT that the Hebrews/Jews copied the story of Noah from the Epic of Gilgamesh and then edited it. So this brings me to wonder which is correct, the 6 days/nights or the 60 days/nights number! Does it take a week to destroy the world with a cataclysm? Or does it take 2 months to destroy the world in a cataclysm? It’s interesting to discover the answer of this riddle.

“In another legend, Viracocha had two sons, Imahmana Viracocha and Tocapo Viracocha. After the Great Flood and the Creation, Viracocha sent his sons to visit the tribes to the northeast and northwest to determine if they still obeyed his commandments. Viracocha traveled North. During their journey, Imaymana and Tocapo gave names to all the trees, flowers, fruits, and herbs. They also taught the tribes which of these were edible, which had medicinal properties, and which were poisonous. Eventually, Viracocha, Tocapo and Imahmana arrived at Cusco (in modern-day Peru) and the Pacific seacoast, where they walked away across the water until they disappeared. The word "Viracocha" literally means "Sea Foam.”

>> I’m saying this again: I’m not surprised to hear he is connected to the sea.

“Etymology

Tiqsi Huiracocha may have several meanings. In the Quechuan languages, tiqsi means foundation or base, wira means fat, and qucha means lake, sea, or reservoir.[10] Viracocha's many epithets include great, all knowing, powerful, etc. Some people state that Wiraqucha could mean "Fat (or foam) of the sea.”

However, linguistic, historical and archaeological evidence suggest that the name could be a borrowing of Aymara Wila Quta (wila "blood"; quta "lake"), due to the sacrifices of camelids that were celebrated at Lake Titiqaqa by pre-Incan Andean cultures that spoke Aymara[12]. Viracocha is often referred to a lord "Tunuupa", which in both Quechua and Aymara have a clear provenance from "Tunu"= mill or central support pillar of a roundhouse and "upa"= the bearer, the one who carries.[4] Thus, "Tunuupa" or "Tunupa" may be read as the "bearer of the mill", while in the Old World the mill or millstone symbolizes time and the making of time, or "the works that make civilization". This epithet of Viracocha is thus well in line with the assimilation of Viracocha as Saturn, in agreement with Inca cosmogony.”

>> Both name explanation can be true at the same time. If he is a Flood survivor then Viracocha really did come from the sea and can be considered as part of the sea. And he could have been someone with a special type of Blood in a world where there was some sort of central pillar or colomn. Does it make sense to anons? Maybe not much at this point in the thread, but I hope gradually the picture will get clearer and anons will understand better what I mean here. Anons shouldn’t forget that Viracocha does hold a staff in his hand, which can represent leadership but also a pillar = central power.

• Page 508 –