(Please read from the start)
I want to draw anons attention to the FLAT mountain tops we ALSO have on the Nazca Lines site. We’ve seen this before in Palpa Lines Site anons. Just look at the scale of it! You think this was done “manually”, as in with shovels and buckets? It’s impossible to do it in such precission even with tens of thousands of workers (which weren’t available by the way). The terrain leveling indicates high knowledge and even mastering engineering, astronomy, landscape, geology, etc. I consider it even more remarkable than the geoglyphs; we might be able to find a “logical” explanation as to how the geoglyphs were drawn, but this terrain leveling…..at this HUGE scale….how can we explain it? If we follow Main Stream History narrative, it’s impossible to do so and it’s mind boggeling. But….if we continue with the same mind set that there was an ancient “now extinct” civilization that had advanced technology and machinery….then….yes…..it can be explained. We’ve seen such work before in Teotihuacan and Palpa Lines site. A primitive, archaic culture cannot master the environement this way anons; they simply don’t have the knowledge, the tools or the technique to do it. I will let you think about this.
My last words about the Nazca culture are that I’m unable to understand it. Either what is written about them as a general knowledge, Cahuachi or the information provided about the Lines (most of it if not ALL) don’t make much sense to me, contrary to the other cultures in the region. I can explain this in 3 ways:
1 – I don’t have the capacity to understand the Nazca culture, but strangely I was able to understand the other cultures in the area. So I don’t think this is it.
2 – Not much accurate and “clean” data is available, so the information was written by a sloppy, shallow way, by probably an amateur; which I doubt this is the case since the Nazca is probably the most studied culture because the Lines have fascinated loads of researchers.
3 – This is done on purpose to write much but not say much, not provide much information, in other words, they do not want us to know. I didn’t just rely on Main Stream History articles, I also went reading some in the Alternative History = the synthesis is the same = nothing much came out, same type of information.
So in the end, have questions: why is the Nazca information presented this way? What are (((they))) hidding?
-
Page 429 –