(Please read from the start)
“However, there is no other account at the time from other travelers to the region that mentions the particular "whiteness'' of the Natives in Chachapoya. These comments have led to claims, not supported by Cieza de León's chronicle, that the Chachapoyas were blond-haired and European in appearance. The chronicle's use of the term "white" here predates its emergence as a racial classification. Another Spanish author, Pedro Pizarro, described all indigenous Peruvians as "white." Although some authors have quoted Pizarro saying that Chachapoyas were blond, these authors do not quote him directly; instead they quote remarks attributed to him and others by race scientist Jacques de Mahieu in support of his thesis that Vikings had brought civilization to the Americas. Following up on these claims, anthropologist Inge Schjellerup examined the remains of Chachapoyans and found them consistent with other ancient Peruvians. She found, for example, a universal occurrence of shovel-shaped upper incisors and a near-complete absence of the cusp of Carabelli on upper molars — characteristics consistent with other indigneous peoples and inconsistent with Europeans.”
>> Right now as I’m writing this, I’m super pleased with what I’m reading. I know the information is totally strange and is contradictory to anons, but, personally, I strongly believe everything about it; from the blond hair, to the European white skin to the consistness with the indigenous people is correct. Yes, there is an explanation to all of this. And I’m sure glad I just found another piece that consolidates what was a theory, but now, with adding each piece, it’s getting stronger.
“According to the analysis of the Chachapoyas objects made by the Antisuyo expeditions of the Instituto de Arqueología Amazónica, the Chachapoyas do not exhibit Amazon cultural tradition but one more closely resembling an Andean one. Given that the terrain facilitates peripatric speciation, as evidenced by the high biodiversity of the Andean region, the physical attributes of the Chachapoyas are most likely reflecting founder effects, assortative mating, and/or related phenomena in an initially small population sharing a relatively recent common ancestor with other indigenous groups.”
>> This is getting more and more interesting and it’s confirming more and more what I’ve found. Isn’t this another way of saying the Chachapoyas were keeping their blood, or should I say their BLOODLINE PURE? And just to spice it up a bit for the anons: Did you know that until the Armenian Genocide took place, very few, I mean terribly few Armenians, married non-Armenians? It was one of the things that surprised me about Armenians. For CENTURIES, Armenians ONLY married Armenians to keep their blood pure. If an Armenian married a Russian or an Iranian or a Greek etc….well, it could be done, but the person marrying to the OUTSIDE, was treated 99.99% of the time as an outcast and it was considered as a great tabboo.
And don’t jump on the conclusion that the Armenians and the Chachapoyas were Devil worshipers. They were not. This has another meaning = they knew their ORIGINS, they knew what WAS IN their BLOOD – or at least that it had some sort of importance in it.
“The anthropomorphous sarcophagi resemble imitations of funeral bundles provided with wooden masks typical of the "Middle Horizon", a dominant culture on the coast and highlands, also known as the Tiwanaku–Wari culture. The "mausoleums" may be modified forms of the chullpa or pucullo, elements of funeral architecture observed throughout the Andes, especially in the Tiwanaku and Wari cultures.”
>> These are very beautiful. Just a thought anons: Look carefully at those anthropomorphous sarcophagi, don’t they look like watchful/protective guardians to you? Standing there silently on the Cliff edge, like a sentinel, don’t they look like guardian ancestors?
-
Page 459 –