>>9852792

(Please read from the start)

“DNA testing of Egyptian mummies

Hawass has been skeptical of the DNA testing of Egyptian mummies; "From what I understand," he has said, "it is not always accurate and it cannot always be done with complete success when dealing with mummies. Until we know for sure that it is accurate, we will not use it in our research."

In December 2000, a joint team from Waseda University in Japan and Cairo's Ain Shams University tried to get permission for DNA testing of Egyptian mummies, but was denied by the Egyptian Government. Hawass stated at the time that DNA analysis was out of the question because it would not lead to anything.

In February 2010, Hawass and his team announced that they had analyzed the mummies of Tutankhamun and ten other mummies and said that the king could have died from a malaria infection that followed a leg fracture.[43] German researchers Christian Timmann and Christian Meyer have cast doubt on this theory, suggesting other possible alternatives for Tutankhamun's cause of death.

In 2012, a study signed by Hawass disclosed that Ramses III had a haplogroup that is associated with the Bantu expansion and is the most dominant in Sub-Saharan Africa, E1b1a.”

>> Hawass is a gatekeeper. He was guarding the information that came out from the DNA testing. (((They))) have this information but we don’t. So what’s so important about it? Maybe, it’s the genealogy = the bloodline. Maybe it can be traced back to a secret. I’ve lurked on this board for quite a while before I started posting, I’ve read some comments anon put about Hussein being a clone of a Pharaoh. It’s an interesting theory from anons. So I’ve been wondering if Cabal is really capable of creating clones! If so, did (((they))) use old DNA from the mummies to create those clones? It’s totally crazy isn’t it anons? Just how “sick” is cabal? I don’t know if this is real or not. For me, this theory is mind boggling.

“Recognition and awards

Hawass is the recipient of the Egyptian state award of the first degree for his work in the Sphinx restoration project.[46] In 2002, he was awarded the American Academy of Achievements' Golden Plate and the glass obelisk from US scholars for his efforts to the protection and preservation of Ancient Egyptian monuments.[46] In 2003, Hawass was given international membership in the Russian Academy for Natural Sciences (RANS),[46] and in 2006, he was chosen as one of the world's 100 most influential people by Time magazine.”

>> Honoring a faithful minion.

“Relationships with other archaeologists

Hawass has been accused of domineering behaviour, forbidding archaeologists to announce their own findings, and courting the media for his own gain after they were denied access to archaeological sites because, according to Hawass, they were too amateurish.[47] A few, however, have said in interviews that some of what Hawass has done for the field was long overdue.[47] Hawass has typically ignored or dismissed his critics, and when asked about it he indicated that what he does is for the sake of Egypt and the preservation of its antiquities.”

>> Oh! He did more than being domineering.

“Views on Jews and Israel

Hawass has been a long-standing opponent of normalised relations between Israel and Egypt.[49] In January 2009 Hawass wrote in Al-Sharq Al-Awsat that "The concept of killing women, children, and elderly people … seems to run in the blood of the Jews of Palestine" and that "the only thing that the Jews have learned from history is methods of tyranny and torment — so much so that they have become artists in this field." He explained that he was not referring to the Jews' "[original] faith" but rather "the faith that they forged and contaminated with their poison, which is aimed against all of mankind."[50] In an interview on Egyptian television in April 2009 Hawass stated that "although Jews are few in number, they control the entire world" and commented on the "control they have" of the American economy and the media.[51][52][53] He later wrote that he was using rhetoric to explain political fragmentation among the Arabs and that he does not believe in a "Jewish conspiracy to control the world.”

>> LoL!

• Page 154 –

>>9863530

(Please read from the start)

Anons, the ones reading this, everything I’ve put about Hawass, including the following, is for you to use to identify cabal minions in not just your local community but in your entire country. I’m using Hawass as a sample to show anons how it’s done “behind the curtains” for faithful cabal minions and how to spot them. There are plenty of them out there, and it’s up to us anons to identify them and demand they will be held accountable for their bad deeds. No matter where you are, what you speak, what you believe in, not matter what your age, gender, color or faith are, we should unite and fight back, expose this corruption and the corrupt. There are plenty of Hawass like people that need to be exposed all over the globe. Notice the pattern of Hawass and use it to find the ones like him wherever they are. (((They))) always use the same M.O.

“Aftermath of 2011 protests

Criticism of Hawass, in Egypt and more broadly, increased following the protests in Egypt in 2011. On July 12, 2011, The New York Times reported on a story on page A1 that Hawass receives an honorarium each year "of as much as $200,000 from National Geographic to be an explorer-in-residence even as he controls access to the ancient sites it often features in its reports."[55] The Times also reported that he has relationships with two American companies that do business in Egypt.

On April 17, 2011, Hawass was sentenced to jail for one year for refusing to obey a court ruling[56] relating to a contract for the gift shop at the Egyptian Museum to a company with links to Hawass.[55] The ruling was appealed and this specific sentence was suspended pending appeal. The following day, the National Council of Egypt's Administrative Court issued a decree to overturn the court's original ruling, specifying that he would serve no jail time, and would instead remain in his position as Minister of Antiquities. The jail sentence was lifted after a new contract was solicited for the running of the gift shop.”

“Association with Mubarak

As Minister of Antiquities, Hawass has been closely associated with the government of former President Hosni Mubarak. His resignation as minister on March 3, 2011 and his re-appointment to the Ministry on March 30, 2011 have been seen as part of the overall events surrounding Mubarak's resignation. It has been reported that his re-appointment has angered numerous factions, who have opposed the appointment of any of the old guard under Mubarak to new positions in the government.[59] The 2011 Egyptian protests resulted in increased criticism of Hawass. Demonstrators called for his resignation, and the upheaval has increased attention on his relationship with the Mubarak family and the way in which he has increased his public profile in recent years.”

“Commercial endeavours

Hawass has lent his name to a line of men's apparel, described by The New York Times as "a line of rugged khakis, denim shirts and carefully worn leather jackets that are meant, according to the catalog copy, to hark "back to Egypt’s golden age of discovery in the early 20th century"; the clothing was first sold at Harrods department store in London, in April 2011.[56] Critics say the Hawass clothing commercializes Egyptian history, and objected to their understanding that "models had sat on or scuffed priceless ancient artifacts during the photo shoot," an accusation that was denied by Hawass and the clothing manufacturers.[56] Hawass already sells a line of Stetson hats reproducing the ones he wears, which "very much resemble" the ones worn by Harrison Ford in the Indiana Jones movies.”

• Page 155 –

>>9863541

(Please read from the start)

Now I hope anons understand why the alternative historians were always blocked or crippled while working on the Sphinx and other monuments in Egypt. And this is the case in many countries, mostly Turkey. Just like in Egypt (((they))) have full control of every single pebble dug in Turkey. We know a lot has been uncovered there, but we have no access to the data. The government denies the data even exist. When cornered, they give us gibberish excuses or threaten/intimidate us. Hawass is not the only gatekeeper out there.

I want to continue from where I left off about the Great Sphinx on page 150, after my long detour about Hawass.

I think we are not seeing the original FACE of the Sphinx, but a re-carved one, probably dating from the early dynastic times. As I said before, I think the original head of the Sphinx was one of a feline. As for the theory concerning the existence of a second Sphinx, I think that is interesting and I’m curious about it. This can be easily solved with scans and digging authorization, but of course, (((they))) won’t allow that to happen. (((They))) want to keep us in the dark and keep us unable to verify if this is true or not.

During dynastic times, there have been many attempts to restore parts of the body as it was crumbling. This has led to confusion, conflict and misinterpretation but I think the fog is mostly cleared about this issue now. What is catching, it’s the traces of water erosion on the Great Sphinx.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sphinx_water_erosion_hypothesis

“The Sphinx water erosion hypothesis is a fringe claim contending that the main type of weathering evident on the enclosure walls of the Great Sphinx was caused by prolonged and extensive rainfall[1] that would have predated the time of Djedefre and Khafre, the Pharaohs credited by most modern Egyptologists with building the Great Sphinx and Second Pyramid at Giza around 2500 BC.[2] Egyptologists, geologists and others have rejected the water erosion hypothesis and the idea of an older Sphinx, offering various alternative explanations for the cause and date of the erosion.”

“Hypothesis

R. A. Schwaller de Lubicz (1887-1961), a French mystic[3][4] and alternative Egyptologist, first claimed evidence of water erosion on the walls of the Sphinx enclosure in the 1950s.[5] John Anthony West, an author and alternative Egyptologist, investigated Schwaller de Lubicz's ideas further and, in 1989, sought the opinion of Robert M. Schoch, a geologist and associate professor of natural science at the College of General Studies at Boston University.

From his investigation of the enclosure's geology, Schoch concluded the main type of weathering evident on the Sphinx enclosure walls was caused by prolonged and extensive rainfall.[1] According to Schoch, the area has experienced a mean annual rainfall of approximately one inch (2.5 cm) since the Old Kingdom (c. 2686 – 2134 BC), such that, since Egypt's last period of significant rainfall ended between the late fourth and early 3rd millennium BC,[6] the Sphinx's construction must date to the 6th or 5th millennium BC.

Schoch further notes the same heavy precipitation-induced weathering as seen on the walls of the Sphinx enclosure is also found on the core blocks of the Sphinx and Valley Temples, both known to have been originally constructed from blocks taken from the Sphinx enclosure when the body was carved.[10] Though the presence of extensive 4th Dynasty repair work to the Sphinx and associated temples is acknowledged by such Egyptologists as Lehner and Hawass, Schoch contends: "Therefore if the granite facing is covering deeply weathered limestone, the original limestone structures must predate by a considerable degree the granite facing. Obviously, if the limestone cores (originating from the Sphinx ditch) of the temples predate the granite ashlars (granite facings), and the granite ashlars are attributable to Khafre of the Fourth Dynasty, then the Great Sphinx was built prior to the reign of Khafre.”

• Page 156 –

>>9863546

(Please read from the start)

“Colin Reader, a British geologist, agrees that the suggested evidence of weathering indicates prolonged water erosion. Reader found, inter alia, that the flow of rainwater causing the weathering had been stemmed by the construction of 'Khufu's quarries',[11] which lie directly "upstream" of the Sphinx enclosure, and therefore concludes that the Sphinx must predate the reign of Khufu (2589 – 2566 BC), and certainly Khafra, by several hundred years. Reader disagrees with Schoch's palaeometeorological estimates, and instead concludes that the Sphinx dates to the Early Dynastic Period (c. 3150 – 2686 BC).[12][13] To explain the disproportionate size of the head compared to the body, Reader, as does Schoch, also suggests the head of the Sphinx was originally that of a lion and recarved sometime later in the likeness of a pharaoh.”

>> According to them the erosion is attributed to rain fall.

“Response of Egyptologists and archaeologists

Zahi Hawass, former Egyptian minister of state for antiquities affairs and secretary-general of the Supreme Council of Antiquities, was asked in an interview on the PBS series NOVA if it was possible that a more ancient civilization might have sculpted the Sphinx. Hawass replied: "Of course it is not possible for one reason …. No single artifact, no single inscription, or pottery, or anything has been found until now, in any place to predate the Egyptian civilization more than 5,000 years ago."[16] This reasoning and conclusion was supported in a similar NOVA interview by Mark Lehner, another senior Egyptologist.[17] Other archaeologists who have made similar criticisms include Kenneth Feder.”

>> LoL! The hypocrisy of this liar. Since the fox is guarding the hen house, of course no evidence will be found of an older civilization predating the Egyptian one if you hide them, manipulate the data and keep the rest of the world in the dark.

“A different argument used by Egyptologists to ascribe the Sphinx to Khafra is the "context" theory, which notes that the Sphinx is located in the context of the funerary complex surrounding the Second Pyramid, which is traditionally connected with Khafra.[19] Apart from the Causeway, the Pyramid and the Sphinx, the complex also includes the Sphinx Temple and the Valley Temple, both of which display the same architectural style, with 100-tonne stone blocks quarried out of the Sphinx enclosure. A diorite statue of Khafra, which was discovered buried upside down along with other debris in the Valley Temple, is claimed as support for the Khafra theory. Reader agrees that the Sphinx Temple and Valley Temple are closely associated with the Sphinx, as is the Causeway and even part of the Khafra Mortuary Temple, but suggests this evidence merely indicates these structures also predate Khafra and does not link the Sphinx in any way to Khafra. Rainer Stadelmann, former director of the German Archaeological Institute in Cairo suggests Khufu, Khafra's father, was the builder of the Sphinx [20] and contends Khafra's Causeway was built to conform to a pre-existing structure which he concludes, given its location, could only have been the Sphinx.[12] Lehner's official website also offers a similar argument based on an Archaeological sequence of structures built in the area. Lehner points to the way several structures in the area incorporate elements from older structures, and based on the order in which they were constructed concludes that the archaeological sequencing does not allow for a date older than the reign of Khafra.”

>> That statue could have been easily buried later on, just like some sections of the complex could have been built on later dates. This is no conclusive proof. And it’s not just the dating of the Sphinx that is suspected to be wrong, but also that of the pyramids. So it’s not a winning argument to say that because it’s standing in front of the second pyramid it’s built by the same person.

“Hawass points to the poor quality of much of the Giza limestone as the basis for the significant erosion levels. He has concluded, from the present-day rapid rate of erosion on the Member II surface of the Sphinx, that "[t]he eleven hundred years between Khafre and the first major restoration in the Eighteenth Dynasty, or even half this time, would have been more than enough to erode the Member II into the deep recesses behind Phase I restoration masonry".[22] Schoch states that other structures and surfaces on the Giza Plateau are made from the same band of limestone as the Sphinx enclosure, but they do not show the same erosion as the walls of the Sphinx enclosure.”

• Page 157 –