>>9863658

(Please read from the start)

“Response of climatologists

Recent studies by German climatologists Rudolph Kuper and Stefan Kröpelin, of the University of Cologne suggest the change from a wet to a much drier climate may have come to an end around 3500–1500 BC, which is as much as 500 years later than currently thought. Egyptologist Mark Lehner believes this climate change may have been responsible for the severe weathering found on the Sphinx and other sites of the 4th Dynasty. After studying sediment samples in the Nile Valley, Judith Bunbury, a geologist at the University of Cambridge, concluded that climate change in the Giza region may have begun early in the Old Kingdom, with desert sands arriving in force late in the era.

>> I support what is in page 83 about the climate and flora change in Egypt. I think the climate change happened even before the city-states were built in pre-dynastic times. I think it happened after a cataclysm, mentioned in page 83.

“Schoch points out that mudbrick mastabas on the Saqqara plateau about 20 km away, indisputably dated to Dynasties I and II, have survived relatively undamaged, which he believes indicates that no heavy rainfall has occurred in the region since the Early Dynastic Period, and nor was any heavy rain anticipated by those Early Dynastic Period communities who built those structures.”

>> Those mastabas don’t have any erosion signs because they were built during the early dynastic times. So if the erosion occurred, it must have taken place when the mastabas were not built yet, as in pre-dynastic times and maybe, just maybe, much earlier.

“Reader replied to this, stating that they "were built on an area of high ground and do not lie within any natural catchment. These tombs will not, therefore, have been exposed to any significant run-off." He concludes that "the fact that they are not significantly degraded, as Schoch has pointed out, demonstrates that rainfall itself has not been a significant agent of degradation in Egypt."[28] Rainfall water run-off, however, has been a more significant factor. Reader cites evidence of flood water damage in another location to illustrate this.”

>> Mr. Reader, I do like how you think, you are almost there: the mastabas were built in dynastic time, after the flood occurred, this is why we don’t see any signs of erosion on them.

I want to draw anons attention to HOW MANY so called experts have come out to debunk the erosion theory. If I run a background check on each of them, as well as check their bank accounts, what do you think I will find anons? See how it works?

I don’t know if the people of the alternative history, the ones of the fringe theories, are reading any of my drops; if they are, I want to tell them = you are almost there. You diverged a bit by not linking your findings to other stuff from all around the region. Alone, one finding will be easily debunked, dismissed by legions of paid “experts”. But if you combine it with other findings, it will paint a totally different big picture and it will solidify your findings.

• Page 159 –

>>9872918

(Please read from the start)

On its own the water erosion theory doesn’t stand much and we can attribute that to rain fall or maybe the flooding of the Nile. But when we add FOSSILS to it, not just any FOSSILS but SEA LIFE FOSSILS, everything changes = linking the two. It’s absolutely amazing and mind blowing. Because it means at some point, both the Sphinx and the pyramids behind it were totally submerged in SEA water. As the water slowly receded, it eroded the Sphinx.

https://www.theepochtimes.com/fossil-suggests-egyptian-pyramids-and-sphinx-once-submerged-under-sea-water_1274558.html

“[…]

Moreover, at sites such as the Sphinx, the Sphinx temple, and the first 20 courses of the Great Pyramid, the stones are said to exhibit erosion due to deeper water saturation. On temple blocks, there are sediment and alluvial, or material, deposits seen in shallow sea beds and lagoons. As water recedes, it creates an oozing spongy effect in the rock.

For an echinoid to reach 3 inches (8 centimeters), the size of the fossil, it would take about 15 years. Furthermore the amount of sediments and alluvium deposits as well as the intertidal erosion on the shallower areas would take centuries, suggesting the area was flooded for quite some time.”

Anons gotta connect this to two additional pieces from this GIANT puzzle I’ve been slowly putting together. The first piece is in pages 25 & 26. It’s about Noah’s Ark, which is of HUGE importance. Apart being a PHYSICAL fossilized proof of the presence of a SHIP resting on the slopes of a 5000 m + high volcano, FOSSILIZED SEA LIFE was found on the terrain around it. No matter how hard it is to even conceive the thought, it’s undeniable that SEA water reached in some way that altitude. It resulted in the Ark landing at the feet of Mt Ararat and that same Sea water brought SEA LIFE along with it, in a big splash. As the water receded some aquatic creatures got stuck in the area and transformed into fossils with time. If that is not proof enough, if physical archaeological finds are not enough, than maybe the mass slaughter known as genocide of 1 million + Armenian living in what was known as the Armenian kingdom of Cilicia should be good enough proof of the Ark’s authenticity and importance. It is so important, that the Bloodlines decided to wipe out an entire race in the cruelest of ways because of it. Human life is precious. This should not happen again.

• Page 160 –

>>9872938

(Please read from the start)

Since we are talking about fossils, I guess it’s time to mention a find of mine. It’s fossils on mountain slopes.

The story goes like this: On one of my trips to Lebanon, for work, my team members wanted to go site seeing on a Sunday. Just chill out, enjoy ourselves and have fun. It was decided that we would go spend time in a district called Chouf. Our destination was a Medieval Palace where a local Prince used to live, it’s called Beit Al Dine (hope I spelled that right) - as seen in the maps and pictures I’ve attached with this post. After touring the palace and having lunch, it was decided to make a coffee stop at a place in the area. The place was located on a mountain side like the places we see in the picture I’ve attached to this post.

Since I ate a bit too much, I thought it would be “wise” to have a walk in the surrounding nature. So I walked and kept on going downwards towards the bottom of the valley. I had walked for some time and I decided to take a short break, sitting on a rock. When I sat there and looked around, I was startled to see a fossilized seashell. I picked it up, thinking it was strange to see a seashell fossil on a mountain slopes. As I kept on going downwards, the number of fossils grew. Of course I didn’t reach the bottom of the valley, but I noticed the more I headed there, the more there were fossils, by the hundreds, simply scattered on the floor. I picked another and headed back up to the coffee stop since it was getting late. When I arrived I showed the others what I found. The locals told us there are plenty of them in the region and their numbers increase once you go lower into the valley.

After a bit of digging and reading, I found out, there are literally thousands of fossils everywhere on Lebanese soil. It’s like the entire country was under sea water. And it was not just seashell fossils discovered there, but fish fossil as well. Please read the article if you are interested:

https://en.annahar.com/article/645192-ancient-fish-fossils-are-part-of-lebanons-hidden-history

“In the heart of Hakel lay millions of Lebanese fossils that a passerby on the highway would find easy to miss.

The village is situated in the highlands of the district of Jbeil (Byblos), 650 meters above sea level and 57 Km away from Beirut.”

I picked randomly that article anons but it’s good. It mentions the altitude = 650 m above current sea level, where the fossils were found in this article. The Palace we visited is around 860 m above sea level and where I was walking was around the area. Some say that at some time, in a geological time, the entire country was under sea water. My problem with this given explanation is that I know the Med sea was in fact 2 big lakes and not how it is right now.

• Page 161 –

>>9872965

(Please read from the start)

When I looked around the region, I also discovered aquatic fossils were found in Eastern Anatolia.

https://www.aa.com.tr/en/culture/11-million-year-old-fossils-found-in-eastern-turkey/1426224

This means that region was also under sea water, at least all the way up to the altitude mentioned in the article.

Let me make a quick summary: we have aquatic fossil in 3 different locations, each having a different altitude from current sea level: The Giza Plateau, East Anatolia (including Mt Ararat) and the Lebanese mountain range. So like it or not, believe it or not, all of these places were under sea water at some point in time, regardless of how HIGH they are from sea level. That’s a FACT proven by fossil findings.

HOW and WHY these regions were submerged with sea water, we need to gather more pieces of the HUGE puzzle before determining that. This thread is a marathon, not a sprint. Patience is required while I gather the puzzle pieces for anons. Oh! And ignore the dates. It’s impossible to put a date on anything, so I’m not following chronology and not trying to figure it out. If you follow the chronology given, you will get confused and lost. I’ve said this before = I’m only following the archaeological findings.

So the fossils in different locations in East Med region are the first piece needed, the second piece is page 83: “An undetermined cataclysm, between 10,000 and 8,000 BC., causes radical changes: the bridge between Tunisia and Italy collapses, leaving only the Maltese Islands.”

There was no Mediterranean Sea back then, there was a BRIDGE of land linking current day Tunisia and Italy. It collapsed due to a cataclysm. So what is a cataclysm anons?

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/cataclysm

“cataclysm

noun

cat•a•clysm | \ ˈka-tə-ˌkli-zəm \

Definition of cataclysm

1 : flood, deluge

2 : catastrophe sense 3a

3 : a momentous and violent event marked by overwhelming upheaval and demolition broadly : an event that brings great changes an international economic cataclysm.”

So a violent event of big scale took place that brought changes, like having that land bridge between Tunisia and Italy sink. Which in turn it means water, a big amount of water was displaced. So there is no doubt in my mind that at some point the Sphinx and the pyramids behind it were under sea water. Let’s gather the other pieces of the puzzle first anons, it’s important to have all the pieces in our hands first before talking about the HOW and WHY such a thing happened. For now take notes anons.

• Page 162 –