>>9520730

(Please read from the start)

Before we move forward, we must take a quick look at the writing system of Ancient Egypt:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Egyptian_hieroglyphs

“Egyptian hieroglyphs /ˈhaɪrəɡlɪfs/[5][6] were the formal writing system used in Ancient Egypt. Hieroglyphs combined logographic, syllabic and alphabetic elements, with a total of some 1,000 distinct characters.[7][8] Cursive hieroglyphs were used for religious literature on papyrus and wood. The later hieratic and demotic Egyptian scripts were derived from hieroglyphic writing, as was the Proto-Sinaitic script that later evolved into the Phoenician alphabet.[9] Through the Phoenician alphabet's major child systems, the Greek and Aramaic scripts, the Egyptian hieroglyphic script is ancestral to the majority of scripts in modern use, most prominently the Latin and Cyrillic scripts (through Greek) and the Arabic script and Brahmic family of scripts (through Aramaic).”

>> It’s true that there are “cultural” and linguistic influences and exchanges between many civilizations and if you think about it, it’s normal for such things to happen; it even happens nowadays. But the fact that Phoenician evolved from Hieroglyphs ,well…This is what I was thought in my youth. And this is what I thought to be true, real, ever since then….that is, until last year….when I found out about something that changed my entire understanding about the Hieroglyphic writing influencing and helping create the Phoenician alphabet. This is connected to a later section in this research, so please take note of this for now.

“The use of hieroglyphic writing arose from proto-literate symbol systems in the Early Bronze Age, around the 32nd century BC (Naqada III),[2] with the first decipherable sentence written in the Egyptian language dating to the Second Dynasty (28th century BC). Egyptian hieroglyphs developed into a mature writing system used for monumental inscription in the classical language of the Middle Kingdom period; during this period, the system made use of about 900 distinct signs. The use of this writing system continued through the New Kingdom and Late Period, and on into the Persian and Ptolemaic periods. Late survivals of hieroglyphic use are found well into the Roman period, extending into the 4th century AD.[4]

With the final closing of pagan temples in the 5th century, knowledge of hieroglyphic writing was lost. Although attempts were made, the script remained undeciphered throughout the Middle Ages and the early modern period. The decipherment of hieroglyphic writing was finally accomplished in the 1820s by Jean-François Champollion, with the help of the Rosetta Stone.”

“History and evolution

Origin

Hieroglyphs may have emerged from the preliterate artistic traditions of Egypt. For example, symbols on Gerzean pottery from c. 4000 BC have been argued to resemble hieroglyphic writing.

Proto-hieroglyphic symbol systems developed in the second half of the 4th millennium BC, such as the clay labels of a Predynastic ruler called "Scorpion I" (Naqada IIIA period, c. 33rd century BC) recovered at Abydos (modern Umm el-Qa'ab) in 1998 or the Narmer Palette (c. 31st century BC).”

• Page 92 –

>>9533749

(Please read from the start)

“The first full sentence written in mature hieroglyphs so far discovered was found on a seal impression in the tomb of Seth-Peribsen at Umm el-Qa'ab, which dates from the Second Dynasty (28th or 27th century BC). Around 800 hieroglyphs are known to date back to the Old Kingdom, Middle Kingdom and New Kingdom Eras. By the Greco-Roman period, there were more than 5,000.

Geoffrey Sampson stated that Egyptian hieroglyphs "came into existence a little after Sumerian script, and, probably, [were] invented under the influence of the latter",[20] and that it is "probable that the general idea of expressing words of a language in writing was brought to Egypt from Sumerian Mesopotamia".[21][22] There are many instances of early Egypt-Mesopotamia relations, but given the lack of direct evidence for the transfer of writing, "no definitive determination has been made as to the origin of hieroglyphics in ancient Egypt".[23] Others have held that "the evidence for such direct influence remains flimsy” and that “a very credible argument can also be made for the independent development of writing in Egypt…"[24] Since the 1990s, the above-mentioned discoveries of glyphs at Abydos, dated to between 3400 and 3200 BCE, have shed doubt on the classical notion that the Mesopotamian symbol system predates the Egyptian one. However, Egyptian writing appeared suddenly at that time, while Mesopotamia had a long evolutionary history of sign usage in tokens dating back to circa 8000 BCE.

Hieroglyphs became the inspiration for the original alphabet that was ancestral to nearly all others, including the Latin alphabet.”

>> So since now we checked the writing system in ancient Egypt, we can compare it to the cuneiform system including the chronology and the linguistic evolution of both.

There are also Out-of-Place-Artifacts in Ancient Egypt and we are going to take a look at them next:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Out-of-place_artifact

The first one mentioned in this Wikipedia page is what is called the “Helicopter Hieroglyphics” – I know, strange name, but it was named this way because it contained the pictogram of a helicopter as well as other "modern” transport vehicles. And this is what they say about them in this Wikipedia page:

“Abydos helicopter: A pareidolia based on palimpsest carving in an ancient Egyptian temple.”

>> They are telling us that we have an incorrect perception of an object when we look at it. In this case, it’s the shape of a Helicopter. In other words, our minds are playing visual tricks on us according to Wikipedia.

• Page 93 –

>>9533777

(Please read from the start)

So let’s take a closer look at this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Helicopter_hieroglyphs

“Helicopter hieroglyphs refer to an Egyptian hieroglyph carving from the Temple of Seti I at Abydos.

The "helicopter" image is the result of carved stone being re-used over time. The initial carving was made during the reign of Seti I and translates to "He who repulses the nine [enemies of Egypt]". This carving was later filled in with plaster and re-carved during the reign of Ramesses II with the title "He who protects Egypt and overthrows the foreign countries". Over time, the plaster has eroded away, leaving both inscriptions partially visible and creating a palimpsest-like effect of overlapping hieroglyphs.

In paleocontact hypothesis circles[3] the hieroglyphics have been interpreted as an out-of-place artifact depicting a helicopter as well as other examples of modern technology. This claim is dismissed by Egyptologists who highlight this pareidolia is partly based on widely distributed retouched images that removed key details from the actual carvings.”

>> Interesting how the “explanation” changed from an incorrect perception to a re-carved Hieroglyph, so this is why we have an incorrect perception. But you see anons, this explanation doesn’t hold ground. Why?

1st of all, each and every single Hieroglyph is ORDERED by the Pharaoh. This means this is his will and divine request.

2nd, there are professional SPECIALIZED SCRIBES whom put these Hieroglyphs writing together.

3rd, any simple worker cannot just come along and carve whatever he wants to. Any wrong step or mistake while carving this will cost the worker not just his hands and his life, but also the life of his entire family. This was divine work, sacred, no mistakes were allowed.

4th, this process doesn’t just include the scribes who put the text together but also the priests who go through various ceremonies as those writings are carved in the temple…just like what we saw with the pyramid texts.

5th, Ramses II was very close to his father during the kingship of Seti I (as shown in the reliefs from Seti I Temple at Abydos – See picture attached). Even after the death of the later, there are many signs, of respect from his son towards him, including protecting his mummy and tomb from thieves. It was considered a sacrilege to touch or deform anything related to the deceased, especially if it was a Pharaoh. If this inscription’s plaster broke and a piece fell, Ramses would have restored it as it is – maybe ADD a part NEXT to it, but NOT change it. Records of such inscriptions were kept either by royal scribes or priesthood, maybe even both. So Ramses II could have easily restored the inscription without committing a sacrilege.

• Page 94 –

I thank everyone reading this.