(Please read from the start)
I’m still unsatisfied with what I’m reading either about the Quimbaya civilization or those little “airplane” like artifacts. So I did what an old archaeologist like me usually do = go back to the artifact itself. And this is how I decided to take a look at some of the artifacts displayed at the Gold Museum of Bogota, Columbia.
1 – My first picture is for the headdress represented on this breastplate. It should be compared to the others from other cultures.
2 – The second picture depicts on the upper end of the artifact, a person with wings; reminding me of the Birds of Prey headgear I’ve mentioned many times already in this thread. Which in turn indicated that the individual flying gear we’ve seen in other cultures/ civilizations is also (at least) known, if not present and used, in the Quimbaya civilization.
3 - Pictures 3 and 4 are representations of birds. If I’m not mistaking those are used as pendants or amulets. But anons….did you notice something? They are represented, designed, stylized in a complete different way from our “little airplane” artifacts. If the Main Stream or Alternative Historians argue that these mysterious plane like artifacts are actually animal shaped that way in a peculiar artistic style, I can counter that argument by displaying these bird pendants. You gotta understand something about ancient cultures = they don’t make huge leaps in artistic rules and styles in a short period of time. They use most of the time stereotyped iconography; like for example they want to draw an apple, this it is and how it’s not….period. There is no option A, B, C etc. What they do is dedicate a specific TYPE of design for a SPECIFIC object, making the same shape, but they alter the details and fine work within the stereotyped rough design so all the craftwork won’t be the same = if it’s not varied, it will become boring and unattractive to customers.
Here we have the animal represented as what we see in pictures 3 and 4 = totally different design from our little airplanes. Now if anons are not convinced of what I’m saying, take a look at the series of those little airplanes and then take another look at the series of bird pendants. We can easily classify them, separate them into 2 categories based on their design. It’s obvious when you put both series one next to the other that we are dealing with 2 different objects represented: one seems to look like miniature planes, while the second is obviously looking like birds.
5 – And the fifth picture is here to also prove this point I made, since our little airplane artifacts have different designs, not just birds….I’ve also taken a look to the impressive series of animals in the Gold museum of Bogota. Here again, it’s clear, we are dealing with the representation of real animal…and upon closer examination, anons will notice how lifelike these animals are. While such animals are represented in a totally different design when it comes to our little airplanes. There, the main shape is that of a plane, not the animal. Compare it yourselves and make up your own minds.
For me, this brushes away the hypothesis that these miniatures are representation of animals and birds, since we do have the real ones to compare them with. This leaves us with a rather strange hypothesis that these miniatures could actually represent real flying machines of some sort. Anons shouldn’t be surprised at all since we’ve seen the Helicopter glyph and the Saqqara bird already representing flying machine….looking like nowadays flying crafts on top of everything. So the mystery is not a 100% solved here, but we did manage to eliminate some possibilities = wrong paths of interpretation as to what these artifacts might be = narrowing the possibilities. This is where I was at the beginning but gradually, with each new additional discovery, my thoughts evolved and I finally came to the conclusion that these artifacts are MOST PROBABLY a miniature replica of ancient aircrafts. Anons will understand me better at a specific point in this thread later on.
-
Page 573 –