(Please read from the start)
6th. this theory of having one layer on top of the other doesn’t hold up. The rules were very strict and rigid from the very top (Pharaoh) to the bottom = the worker who is going to carve this. Ancient Egyptian were very superstitious about such things as change, this is one of the reasons why they went into so much length into preserving the dead bodies as much as they could to how it was when alive. They feared the soul won’t recognize its original body if there was the slightest change. And this can be applied to everything that has to do with funerary and religious stuff; mostly the Hieroglyphics. These sacred words and Hymns were considered just as essential for the afterlife as the other rituals conducted for the dead.
7th, this point is connected to the previous one: there were very strict rules when it comes to sculptures and carving that’s why we see them as stereotyped, apart a few exceptions like Akhenaten era .So there is no way on earth (unless he got strict orders from the top) that the worker sculpting this might have imagined the “forms” as they are. There were known designs which were taught while the worker was still an apprentice; like if you want to carve a duck this is how you do it, no other way; or if you want to carve a snake under a circle, this is how it looks like, no other way….this is why I called it stereotyped. This is not like handwriting = each has his own personal handwriting. No, this was more like making copies of the same thing. So these glyphs were not “INVENTED” or “IMAGINED” or put there randomly by the worker.
All the above (the 7 points argument) is my own analysis and view. No sources. It’s the result of many years of digging, reading and mostly years of experience, as in accumulating all of this in my head. I may be a bit off on some details or notions, I guess some of my readings are old and new info was put out there – mostly that I’m writing this out of memory. Plus, I don’t remember ever seeing an Egyptian hieroglyphic inscription written one on top of the other = having many layers = over layered inscription. So anons can check these out themselves if they are interested in.
So for all of these reasons, the main history explanations don’t hold up.
The alternative historians offer us other types of explanation like Time Travel or U.F.O. contact etc.; as they try to identify the “objects” in the inscription. But none made any sense to me.
What if there was a third alternative? A third explanation? An explanation that can be found if we explore the CONTEXT of the Helicopter Hieroglyph = zooming out.
I’ve said this before, archaeologists are like crime scene investigators; we don’t analyze only the evidence collected, but we also check the entire crime scene to see if everything fits and we try to recreate the events that took place. And this is what I’m going to try to do next.
-
Page 95 –