>>11607804

(Please read from the start)

I want to take a closer look to a part of the site known as the Pumapunku: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pumapunku

“Pumapunku or Puma Punku (Aymara and Quechua puma "cougar, puma," punku "door"; Hispanicized Puma Puncu) is part of a large temple complex or monument group that is part of the Tiwanaku Site near Tiwanaku, in western Bolivia. It is believed to date to AD 536 and later.

Tiwanaku is significant in Inca traditions because it is believed to be the site where the world was created.[1] In Aymara, Puma Punku's name means "The Door of the Puma". The Pumapunku complex consists of an unwalled western court, a central unwalled esplanade, a terraced platform mound that is faced with stone, and a walled eastern court.”

>> I found this very interesting: isn’t a door also a gateway? So is this the gateway of the Puma? = feline. It’s fascinating how the place where the GATE = DOOR exists is also the place where it is believed that the world was created. I like it ^_^

“At its peak, Pumapunku is thought to have been "unimaginably wondrous,"[3] adorned with polished metal plaques, brightly colored ceramic and fabric ornamentation, and visited by costumed citizens, elaborately dressed priests, and elites decked in exotic jewelry. Current understanding of this complex is limited due to its age, the lack of a written record, and the current deteriorated state of the structures due to treasure hunting, looting, stone mining for building stone and railroad ballast, and natural weathering.

Description

The Pumapunku is a terraced earthen mound that is faced with blocks. It is 167.36 metres (549.1 feet) wide along its north–south axis and 116.7 metres (383 feet) long along its east–west axis. On the northeast and southeast corners of the Pumapunku, it has 20-metre (66-foot) wide projections that extend 27.6 metres (91 feet) north and south from the rectangular mound.

The eastern edge of the Pumapunku is occupied by what is called the Plataforma Lítica. This structure consists of a stone terrace that is 6.75 by 38.72 metres (22.1 by 127.0 feet) in dimension. This terrace is paved with multiple enormous stone blocks. It contains the largest stone slab found in both the Pumapunku and Tiwanaku Site, measuring 7.81 metres (25.6 feet) long, 5.17 metres (17.0 feet) wide and averages 1.07 m (3 ft 6 in) thick. Based upon the specific gravity of the red sandstone from which it was carved, this stone slab has been estimated to weigh 131 tonnes (144 short tons).”

>> I’m very very interested in the megalithic structures and constructions. Very. Ask yourselves anons: how did such blocks of stone get where they are? Remember the reed boats (p. 477)? Take a good and long look at the blocks and the reed boats. Take your time. Think deep and long, then ask yourself if it’s rationally doable to transport such blocks (remember the weight) on such boats.

If the answer is YES = we can transport such blocks on such type of boats, then it means these boats are sturdier than what is told about them by the Main Stream History. It also means the Main Stream History has been lying to the researcher and trying to divert the course of the research when it comes to the Kuphar, so that no one would discover it was used by the survivors of the Great Flood whom came out from Noah’s Ark.

• Page 485 –

>>11624875

(Please read from the start)

If the answer is NO = we cannot transport such blocks on such type of boats, then it means these blocks were transported there using another method or another “means” of transport. So what can it be? We can all agree it’s impossible to do it via Llama. And I guess it’s absurd to even consider the idea of moving those blocks just by using wood logs and push the stone blocks on them. Same theory pushed forward by Main Stream History for the Giza pyramids stone blocks: it didn’t hold there, it doesn’t hold here. So again, how did they move these blocks, from the quarry to the construction site? What if some sort of “transportation” was used? I’ve hinted at it a few times already. Did anons catch it?

“The other stonework and facing of the Pumapunku consists of a mixture of andesite and red sandstone. Pumapunku's core consists of clay, while the fill underlying selected parts of its edge consists of river sand and cobbles instead of clay. Excavations have documented "three major building epochs, in addition to small repairs and remodeling.

The area within the kilometer separating the Pumapunku and Kalasasaya complexes has been surveyed using ground-penetrating radar, magnetometry, induced electrical conductivity, and magnetic susceptibility. The geophysical data collected from these surveys and excavations have revealed the presence of numerous man-made structures in the area between the Pumapunku and Kalasasaya complexes. These structures include the wall foundations of buildings and compounds, water conduits, pool-like features, revetments, terraces, residential compounds, and widespread gravel pavements, all of which now lie buried and hidden beneath the modern ground’s surface.”

>> So it means we have 3 construction phases = 3 generations. Also it seems there is a lot of unearthing to be done on the site. This place got a lot of secrets to reveal.

“Age

Researchers have worked to determine the age of the Pumapunku complex since the discovery of the Tiwanaku site. As noted by Andean specialist, W. H. Isbell, professor at Binghamton University,[2] a radiocarbon date was obtained by Vranich[3] from organic material from the lowermost and oldest layer of mound-fill forming the Pumapunku. This layer was deposited during the first of three construction epochs and dates the initial construction of the Pumapunku to AD 536–600 (1510 ±25 B.P. C14, calibrated date). Since the radiocarbon date came from the lowermost and oldest layer of mound-fill underlying the andesite and sandstone stonework, the stonework must have been constructed sometime after AD 536–600. The excavation trenches of Vranich show that the clay, sand, and gravel fill of the Pumapunku complex lie directly on the sterile middle Pleistocene sediments. These excavation trenches also demonstrated the lack of any pre-Andean Middle Horizon cultural deposits within the area of the Tiwanaku Site adjacent to the Pumapunku complex.”

>> I think the dating should be re-examined. Reminds me of the Giza pyramids blocks.

• Page 486 –

>>11624884

(Please read from the start)

“Engineering

The largest of Pumapunku's stone blocks is 7.81 meters long, 5.17 meters wide, averages 1.07 meters thick, and is estimated to weigh about 131 tonnes. The second largest stone block found within the complex is 7.90 metres (25.9 feet) long, 2.50 metres (8 feet 2 inches) wide, and averages 1.86 metres (6 feet 1 inch) thick. Its weight has been estimated to be 85.21 tonnes. Both of these stone blocks are part of the Plataforma Lítica and composed of red sandstone.[5] Based upon detailed petrographic and chemical analyses of samples from both individual stones and known quarry sites, archaeologists concluded that these and other red sandstone blocks were transported up a steep incline from a quarry near Lake Titicaca roughly 10 kilometres (6.2 miles) away. Smaller andesite blocks that were used for stone facing and carvings came from quarries within the Copacabana Peninsula about 90 kilometres (56 miles) away from and across Lake Titicaca from the Pumapunku and the rest of the Tiwanaku Site.”

>> Anons studying megalithic structures should take note.

“Archaeologists argue that the transport of these stones was accomplished by the large labor force of ancient Tiwanaku. Several theories have been proposed as to how this labor force transported the stones, although these theories remain speculative. Two of the more common proposals involve the use of llama skin ropes and the use of ramps and inclined planes.”

>> Pushing forward same narrative as with Giza pyramids. I would like to point out to anons that in this region of the world, we don’t have a FLAT surface like what we do in Ancient Egypt. Here, this site, it’s built on mountains slopes, high altitude terrain. So think WELL how much labor that is = double what we have with Giza pyramids, if we believe Main Stream History narrative about it.

Let me make something clear:

In both cases = Giza pyramids and Puma Punku blocks could have been transported via waterway. Yes, it’s doable, but not pushed on land. Also, if they were transported via waterway, it’s still hard to get them from the quarry to the boat, load them on it and unload them. Using the waterway explains/is possible for a portion of the riddle, not all of it.

“In assembling the walls of Pumapunku, each stone was finely cut to interlock with the surrounding stones. The blocks were fit together like a puzzle, forming load-bearing joints without the use of mortar. One common engineering technique involves cutting the top of the lower stone at a certain angle, and placing another stone on top of it which was cut at the same angle. The precision with which these angles have been used to create flush joints is indicative of a highly sophisticated knowledge of stone-cutting and a thorough understanding of descriptive geometry. Many of the joints are so precise that not even a razor blade will fit between the stones. Much of the masonry is characterized by accurately cut rectilinear blocks of such uniformity that they could be interchanged for one another while maintaining a level surface and even joints. However, the blocks do not have the same dimensions, although they are close. The blocks were so precisely cut as to suggest the possibility of prefabrication and mass production, technologies far in advance of the Tiwanaku’s Inca successors hundreds of years later. Some of the stones are in an unfinished state, showing some of the techniques used to shape them. They were initially pounded by stone hammers, which can still be found in numbers on local andesite quarries, creating depressions, and then slowly ground and polished with flat stones and sand.

Tiwanaku engineers were also adept at developing a civic infrastructure at this complex, constructing functional irrigation systems, hydraulic mechanisms, and waterproof sewage lines.”

• Page 487 –

>>11640915

(Please read from the start)

>> Highly important information for those whom are researching the megalithic sites. Anons, the construction TECHNIQUE using the metal clamps (mostly bronze) and the way the stone blocks were cut is IDENTICAL to another megalithic site = Baalbek. It’s true that the shape of the clamps and their size may differ a bit from one megalithic site to another, but the construction TECHNIQUE is IDENTICAL. I’ve been to Baalbek several times and I’ve seen them with my own eyes and I can confirm not even a razor blade can fit between the stones. I’ve literally tried to make one fit, it didn’t get in. I agree this is a HIGHLY ADVANCED construction and engineering knowledge. And the drainage system for both sites is also IDENTICAL. If I wanted to write right now about Baalbek, I would simply copy/paste these 2 paragraphs from Pumapunku and put them under the Baalbek name because it’s identical. And let me give you another piece of information; I believe this one is rare = not many know of this = the Baalbek megalithic site was built in such a way to witstand earthquakes. It can handle a 7 point something earthquakes without the blocks crumbling. That’s an incredible building achievement anons. If you look at the mega constructions we’ve got nowdays in earthquake zones, like L.A. or Tokyo city, those skyscrapers, can they witstand an earthquake without falling? Sure, some do, but to which degree? If I’m not mistaking, with the best engineering we’ve got nowadays, such buildings can witstands a 7 degrees + earthquake, but start to get heavy damage around 8 and above. Well, guess what? It’s the same for Baalbek.

You are not supposed to know this type of information anons. It has been kept from you and the general public. Is anyone researching this has detailed and extended information on Baalbek as a megalithic site? I’ve seen some online about the other sites, but NEVER about Baalbek = no measurements, no publications, nothing. The site is barely mentioned as a megalithic one. I have information about the site. I haven’t decided yet what to do with it. I guess I was lucky the Lebanese archaeologists gave me special tours (no public access) and provided me detailed info about it.

Now I want to draw anons attention just a bit on 4 STRANGE HINTS or clues:

1 – The megalithic stone blocks.

2 – The BIG Doors.

3 – The myth of creation with Giants involved.

4 – The Iconography of the Staff-God on the “Gate of the Sun”, where he is depicted BIGGER in SIZE then his “helpers”.

All 4 clues point out in one direction = existence of GIANTS. I say all of these are circumstantial evidence. If one of them exists alone, then it can be explained as religious or artistical representation. But the existence of 4 clues in one specific area doesn’t allow us to dismiss this idea, mostly that the clues come from different types of sources/supporting materials: stones, architecture, myths, religious beliefs and artistic representation. Just take note of this for now, we will talk about it later on when we reach it.

I’m not going to look into the MYTH of Creation where those giants played a role with the Tiwanaku culture; since it’s the same myth adopted/copied by the Incas, I’m going to talk about it there, to avoid repeating myself.

Before going to the Incas, I want to take a look at some notables about the Tiwanaku culture: there is MORE.

• Page 488 –