Anonymous ID: 91ce17 Nov. 7, 2020, 5:31 a.m. No.11519459   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9488

>>11498214

 

(Please read from the start)

 

There are other sites with Wari culture ruins that anons can check out if interested. As for me, I want to take a look at the Wari geoglyph:

 

https://www.ancient-origins.net/news-history-archaeology/wari-geoglyph-similar-nazca-lines-found-peru-001908

 

“26 JULY, 2014 - 02:36 APRILHOLLOWAY

 

Wari geoglyph similar to Nazca lines found in Peru

 

Archaeologists carrying out excavations in Arequipa in southern Peru were stunned to find a large geoglyph which resembles the famous Nazca lines, according to a report in Peru21. The massive geoglyph is the first of its kind discovered in the region. It has been linked to the pre-Inca Wari culture (1200-1300 AD), although it is not clear how the researchers reached this conclusion.”

 

>> Of course they were stunned because somehow, someway, (((they))) convinced everyone that only the Nazca made geoglyphs and ignored all the others; or maybe simply belittled them. Just focus on the Nazca and don’t look another place. I also ask the same question to the alternative history = why focus so much on the Nazca geoglyphs and barely pay attention to the others?

 

“The geoglyph, which measures 60 metres by 40 metres, was discovered during archaeological investigations being carried out ahead of an irrigation project in the province of Caylloma. It consists of a large rectangular image with geometric shapes and lines within it and is similar to many of the geoglyphs found in Nazca.”

 

>> I disagree, it’s not similar, but this one is exceptional = rectangle with almost perfect 90 degrees angles. We don’t have anything similar to it with the Nazaca Lines not even with the Palpa Lines. I see symetry in the way this design was drawn. It’s like a big piece of paper. I wonder: if we can digitally “fold” this like we do with an A4 paper, fold it once in length and once in width will we have ALMOST a perfect match?

 

“The Nazca geoglyphs cover an incredible 450 km2 and are among archaeology's greatest enigmas because of their quantity, nature, size and continuity. The geoglyphs depict living creatures, stylized plants and imaginary beings, as well as geometric figures several kilometres long. The startling feature of the Nazca geoglyphs is that they can only really be appreciated from the air, raising questions about how and why they were created.”

 

  • Page 471 –

Anonymous ID: 91ce17 Nov. 7, 2020, 5:33 a.m. No.11519488   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1683

>>11519459

 

(Please read from the start)

 

“The lines were made by scraping away the reddish, iron oxide covered stones that cover the desert surface to reveal the white sand beneath. In most places wind, rain and erosion would quickly remove all traces of this within a few years. At Nazca, though, the lines have been preserved because it is such a windless, dry and isolated location.”

 

>> Anons I’m having still trouble with this. Ever since I’ve been reading about HOW the lines were supposedly done and how easy it is to do them, I’m having a hard time to wrap this around my head. And these paragraphs just shows it = in the first it’s written no one knows how or why the lines were created, and in the second one, they tell us it’s by scraping the stones. On top the lines were preserved because of the windless, dry, isolated location. Anons, I don’t know. I’ve been scratching my head so much because of this. Maybe I’m getting too slow and too old but for me, I feel like things don’t add up and I’m missing something here. I have this intuition that I lack a piece, or a connection, a tiny little link. I’m not convinced by what they put forward as an explanation, I feel there is a part missing or not matching up.

 

“While the Nazca geoglyphs date back to between 200 BC to 500 AD, to a time when a people referred to as the Nazca inhabited the region, archaeologists have dated the latest discovery in Arequipa to the later part of Wari culture (1200 – 1300 AD). However, no explanation has yet been given about why the geoglyph has been associated with the Wari and how it was dated.”

 

>> In other words, no one knows a thing about it and we are taking their words for it being associated to the Wari; which also means the dating must be off.

 

“The Wari (Spanish: Huari) civilization flourished from about 600 AD in the Andean highlands and forged a complex society widely regarded today as ancient Peru’s first empire. Their Andean capital, Huari, became one of the world's great cities of the time. Relatively little is known about the Wari because no written record remains, although thousands of archaeological sites reveal much about their lives. If indeed the newly-discovered geoglyph was created by the Wari, the finding serves to shed new light on Wari cultural practices, which could have been influenced by the Nazca people.

 

Much to the annoyance of Consorcio Angostura-Siguas, the agroindustrial company executing the irrigation project, the finding now jeopardizes the continuity of the plan.”

 

>> I’m going to stop here when it comes to the Wari culture anons. It’s obvious more needs to be uncovered about them, there is a lack of information, it’s incomplete.

 

  • Page 472 –