Anonymous ID: 937013 July 29, 2020, 3:58 a.m. No.10113442   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3476 >>4049

>>10100125

 

(Please read from the start)

 

Just a quick look at Darwinism.

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Darwinism

 

“Darwinism is a theory of biological evolution developed by the English naturalist Charles Darwin (1809–1882) and others, stating that all species of organisms arise and develop through the natural selection of small, inherited variations that increase the individual's ability to compete, survive, and reproduce. Also called Darwinian theory, it originally included the broad concepts of transmutation of species or of evolution which gained general scientific acceptance after Darwin published On the Origin of Species in 1859, including concepts which predated Darwin's theories. English biologist Thomas Henry Huxley coined the term Darwinism in April 1860.”

 

“Terminological confusion

 

Darwinism subsequently referred to the specific concepts of natural selection, the Weismann barrier, or the central dogma of molecular biology.[2] Though the term usually refers strictly to biological evolution, creationists[who?] have appropriated it to refer to the origin of life.[3] It is therefore considered the belief and acceptance of Darwin's and of his predecessors' work, in place of other concepts, including divine design and extraterrestrial origins.

 

[…]

 

While the term Darwinism has remained in use amongst the public when referring to modern evolutionary theory, it has increasingly been argued by science writers such as Olivia Judson and Eugenie Scott that it is an inappropriate term for modern evolutionary theory.[7][8] For example, Darwin was unfamiliar with the work of the Moravian scientist and Augustinian friar Gregor Mendel,[9] and as a result had only a vague and inaccurate understanding of heredity. He naturally had no inkling of later theoretical developments and, like Mendel himself, knew nothing of genetic drift, for example.

 

In the United States, creationists often use the term "Darwinism" as a pejorative term in reference to beliefs such as scientific materialism, but in the United Kingdom the term has no negative connotations, being freely used as a shorthand for the body of theory dealing with evolution, and in particular, with evolution by natural selection.

 

>> See how this page in Wikipedia is written anons? Compare how it’s written with how (((they))) write about the “fringe” theories. The Creationists are such bad people! That is if you believe the narrative (((they))) are putting forward.

 

“These are the basic tenets of evolution by natural selection as defined by Darwin:

  1. More individuals are produced each generation than can survive.

  2. Phenotypic variation exists among individuals and the variation is heritable.

  3. Those individuals with heritable traits better suited to the environment will survive.

  4. When reproductive isolation occurs new species will form.”

 

For additional information if anons wants to read more: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution

 

The biblical theory is God created everything while with the evolution theories, including the one of Darwin there has been an evolution where only the fittest survive. Based on this, along the decades, “scientists” have built up the “Tree of Evolution” (or Tree of Life) and they have divided time into eras or geological periods like the: “Miocene, Pliocene, Tertiary, Quaternary”. I’m just giving random examples of the names anons – hope I got the names right, I always forget them. Of course they classified the fauna according to the geological eras, putting the species in this or that era. But all of this is in full front collision with the existence of Noah’s Ark on Mt Ararat (I’ve said this before). So I’m seriously doubting all of the classifications and the divisions and the geological eras and the dates given to everything (= dating millions of years this or that).

 

All of this, it’s time to seriously start to question it. It’s time to consider the possibility that all of this is incorrect and that MAYBE, just MAYBE the dinosaurs didn’t exist millions of years ago but co-existed with Humans (JUST MAYBE). That maybe, just maybe, all of these incredible maritime fossils we see all around the Med Sea, like a belt, maybe, they weren’t millions of years old, but just a few thousands of years old, dating back from AROUND when the Flood occurred. Super crazy idea, right? Well, I will let you take note for now and think about it. Let’s check the other puzzle pieces before we make up our minds because even I am hesitating about this point. I’ve been convinced so much of the evolution theory for most of my life; this is why this is taking some time to sink in for me. All I’m asking for now is to take this into consideration anons.

 

  • Page 225 –

Anonymous ID: 937013 July 29, 2020, 4:09 a.m. No.10113476   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3744

>>10113442

 

(Please read from the start)

 

In page 222 I’ve said I had a thought when I read about the fossils in Libya matching those in Fayum and Oman.

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Sea

 

“The Red Sea (Arabic: Al Baḥr al aḥmar‎, Hebrew: Yam Soof ים סוף or HaYam HaAdom הים האדום) is a seawater inlet of the Indian Ocean, lying between Africa and Asia. The connection to the ocean is in the south through the Bab el Mandeb strait and the Gulf of Aden. To the north lie the Sinai Peninsula, the Gulf of Aqaba, and the Gulf of Suez (leading to the Suez Canal). The Red Sea is a Global 200 ecoregion. The sea is underlain by the Red Sea Rift which is part of the Great Rift Valley.”

 

[…]

 

“Geology

 

The Red Sea was formed by the Arabian peninsula being split from the Horn of Africa by movement of the Red Sea Rift. This split started in the Eocene and accelerated during the Oligocene.”

 

>> So at some point in time the Arabic peninsula and Africa were connected and not separated by the Red Sea. This explains the findings of page 222.

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Rift_Valley

 

“The Great Rift Valley is a series of contiguous geographic trenches, approximately 6,000 kilometres (3,700 mi) in total length, that runs from the Beqaa Valley in Lebanon which is in Asia to Mozambique in Southeast Africa.[1] While the name continues in some usages, it is rarely used in geology as it is considered an imprecise merging of separate though related rift and fault systems.”

 

>> Is it farfetched anons to consider the possibility this rift occurring during the cataclysm?

 

We see the mass of water covering all of the countries surrounding the Med Sea because of the fossils. But we also have similarities in the type of fossils between one region and the other. So could they have been connected back then? It seems the answer is a YES. And we’ve seen the bridge of land between Tunisia and Italy get underwater because of this cataclysm during the same period. So can we assume that land MOVED and SPLIT elsewhere in the region, not just submerged? It seems so anons, from the look of it all, it seems this is exactly what happened.

 

I’m starting to have a very different picture in my mind anons about this cataclysm. It wasn’t just rain flooding the entire region. We also had massive amount of water displacement. There were additionally things taking place with the land. And if land moved, it means Earthquakes, right? And just by looking at the second map I’ve attached with this drop, the line where the rift occurred is literally sprinkled with Volcanoes. Geology, fossils and maps are telling us a very different story than just loads of rain water falling in the region. It’s starting to look like a full scale cataclysm, Armageddon scenario type.

 

With this I would have finished with the African continent, time to move to another one.

 

  • Page 226 –