>>12035808

(Please read from the start)

In the second video, the guy seems to have a “latino” surname (maybe Spaniard) and he has an accent. This is making me think he might be a Peruvian urban citizen or someone from a neighboring country. This is important, and I’m talking on purpose about this just to show anons how different persons see and view things depending on their background = how and where they are born and raised. Just compare with the previous video, you will notice the approach to the site is totally different.

1 – First difference is how he is pronoucing the name of the site. This is the correct pronounciation anons, the guy in the first video totally butchered it. This happens a lot when you switch from one culture to the other and from one language to the other. And this is something I’m familiar with since I speak fluently 5 languages myself. And this is one of the reasons why I’m in the mind set of Paysseur = Passeur. Those whom have been reading what I write from the first thread know what I’m talking about now.

2 – This guy is on the “Aliens existing” train, which I’m not. So anons know I’m not going to be supportive of anything he says about the aliens. I won’t agree with his theories and comments about them.

3 – He gives the location and he mentions the stones are similar to the ones in Colorado. He also talks a bit about the “devil’s gate” from a historical approach, which is good, just to give us a quick idea. This is what I do when I post all of those pages from an encyclopaedia; it’s to provide a quick background for the reader. He also mentions this being a stargate and the possible link to Lemuria or Atlantis. He also talks about a theory of the Inca Sun disk (remember the disk stolen by the Vatican and it vanished ^_~ ) being located in the portal. Interesting, isn’t it anons?

• Page 554 –

>>12050140

(Please read from the start)

4 – He then talks about the hole or the notch along with the edges. The description he gives of it is absolutly correct and spot on. Something fits in the hole. People put it in there, it’s gotta be something like a sphere, at least at its bottom end for it to fit into the hole. Then the person kneels and put his hands on the edge = the T shape. Proof of that is the angle and shape of the edge. Unfortunetly one is broken, but the other is good. Look closely to the picture I’ve attached of the T shape door. I’ve put 2 lines parallel to the door edge. The Yellow line is close to how the edge is shaped and the angle it’s in. This inclination angle is close to what we have nowadays to stair holders or handrails, mostly used when we climb stairs. But there are no stairs here, right?

The second piece is actually the convex shape of where the hand rest: there is what we call in French “l’usure” = wear or “frottement” = friction. I’ve added a parallel red line to it to higlight it for anons. This shape you see is due to friction or wear and it’s caused by repeating the friction = used a lot. If the friction was on top then we would have a concave shape but since it’s a convex shape on the angle, this is proof that there was an inclination there, probably a 45 degrees angle, which is perfect to rest the palm of the hand on; which with repitition can cause friction and create that convex shape. The light blue line I’ve added should have been the shape if some statuettes would have been placed there, but since there is friction and an inclined angle, then this is for the hand to rest upon.

A third proof that a person kneeled there, and placed their hands on the edges is the door sill or what most call the threshold= It’s concave, (I’ve highlighted it in orange) due to friction, it was very used, either for kneeling or standing there for many many times. But since one of the sides is damaged, the cut is kinda (more or less) on the vertical, which makes it hard for ordinary people to notice its concave shape. We can only rely on the good undamaged angle to say it’s a concave shape. Compage the undamaged lower corner to the upper corners of the T shaped door (I’ve put green lines parallel to them). Notice how the curve up there is narrower, the angle of the “turn” is different from the wide curve we have on the lower (orange) undamaged end. I think when this door was carved orginally, the lower door angles were similar to the upper ones, but with friction and wear, with time, it changed.

• Page 555 –