>>10340128

(Please read from the start)

The last place to check about the Aztecs is Aztlán, their supposedly mythical place of origin.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aztl%C3%A1n

“Aztlán (from Nahuatl languages: Aztlān, Nahuatl pronunciation: [ˈastɬaːn] is the ancestral home of the Aztec peoples. Aztecah is the Nahuatl word for "people from Aztlan". Aztlan is mentioned in several ethnohistorical sources dating from the colonial period, and each of them give different lists of the different tribal groups who participated in the migration from Aztlan to central Mexico, but the Mexica who went on to found Mexico-Tenochtitlan are mentioned in all of the accounts. Historians have speculated about the possible location of Aztlan and tend to place it either in northwestern Mexico or the southwest US, although there are doubts about whether the place is purely mythical or represents a historical reality.”

“Legend

Nahuatl legends relate that seven tribes lived in Chicomoztoc, or "the place of the seven caves". Each cave represented a different Nahua group: the Xochimilca, Tlahuica, Acolhua, Tlaxcalteca, Tepaneca, Chalca, and Aztec. Because of their common linguistic origin, those groups are called collectively "Nahualteca" (Nahua people). These tribes subsequently left the caves and settled "near" Aztlán.

The various descriptions of Aztlán apparently contradict each other. While some legends describe Aztlán as a paradise, the Codex Aubin says that the Aztecs were subject to a tyrannical elite called the Azteca Chicomoztoca. Guided by their priest, the Aztec fled, and, on the road, their god Huitzilopochtli forbade them to call themselves Azteca, telling them that they should be known as Mexica. Scholars of the 19th century—in particular Alexander von Humboldt and William H. Prescott—translated the word Azteca, as is shown in the Aubin Codex to Aztec.

Some say[3] that the southward migration began on May 24, 1064 CE, after the Crab Nebula events from May to July 1054. Each of the seven groups is credited with founding a different major city-state in Central Mexico.”

>> Note number 7…..7 tribes, 7 clans or was it 7 kingdoms perhaps?

• Page 279 –

>>10356182

(Please read from the start)

“Places postulated as Aztlán

Friar Diego Durán (c. 1537–1588), who chronicled the history of the Aztecs, wrote of Aztec emperor Moctezuma I's attempt to recover the history of the Mexica by congregating warriors and wise men on an expedition to locate Aztlán. According to Durán, the expedition was successful in finding a place that offered characteristics unique to Aztlán. However, his accounts were written shortly after the conquest of Tenochtitlan and before an accurate mapping of the American continent was made; therefore, he was unable to provide a precise location.

During the 1960s, Mexican intellectuals began to seriously speculate about the possibility that Mexcaltitán de Uribe was the mythical city of Aztlán. One of the first to consider Aztlán being linked to the Nayaritian island was historian Alfredo Chavero towards the end of the 19th century. Historical investigators after his death tested his proposition and considered it valid, among them Wigberto Jiménez Moreno. This hypothesis is still up for debate.”

>> Notice: use of Kuphar = coracle.

The notables:

All the information I’ve put about the Mesoamericans is for anons to use for comparison with other civilizations and cultures. These are the sections you can use to analyze and compare with.

Notable 1: The concept of City-State is actually rare, anons can use that to compare. If my memory serves me right, we have the concept of City-State in Sumerian and Akkadian civilizations; as well as Phoenician and then Greek Polis. This is also the case of pre-dynastic Egypt, before even the existence of the 2 kingdoms.

Notable 2: Even rarer is the concept of the King-Priest, we only see that in the earliest times ever; in ancient Egypt as well as Mesopotamia and Mesoamerica.

Notable 3: The system of writing is also an additional way to compare. Special attention should be given to the Olmec one.

All the traditions and daily practices had a common starting point, the closer we are chronologically to the starting point, to the origin, the closer we are to the common root for all of this. The further we go down in time, the more we get distanced from the root because of all the additions that were put by later generations = getting further from the truth.

A lot of people have noticed the similarities between the Mesoamerican pyramids and the ones in Giza and Mesopotamia, that’s what most compare and discuss, but the 3 notables I just mentioned above are much more important because they are close to the core of it. They are close because they are habits and traditions passed on from what I believe are the survivors of the Great Flood. The way we live, HOW we live…..such things, it’s transmitted from one generation to another; it takes many, many generations for them to change and evolve. So the closer we get to the starting point after the Flood the closer we know how life was before the Flood.

And this brings me to the 4th notable: the structure of the society. I noticed the hierarchy of the society: it’s divided horizontally between the “rulers” and the “commoners”; then each is divided vertically into “sectors” like clergy, warriors, traders, scribes etc. I’m not sure if I’m explaining this in a correct way. What I see it more like a Bee Hive or an Ant Nest sort of organized society before the Flood, with each sector having its own specific role. This is another common point with what we see in Ancient Egypt, Mesoamerica and Mesopotamia.

• Page 280 –