(Please read from the start)
Now I’m going to move to the next out-of-place-Artifact from the same Wikipedia page, so I’m not going to repost the link:
“Saqqara Bird: Supposedly depicts a glider, but made in Ancient Egypt.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saqqara_Bird#Controversial_ideas
“The Saqqara Bird is a bird-shaped artifact made of sycamore wood, discovered during the 1898 excavation of the Pa-di-Imen tomb in Saqqara, Egypt. It has been dated to approximately 200 BCE, and is now housed in the Museum of Egyptian Antiquities in Cairo. The Saqqara Bird has a wingspan of 180 mm (7.1 in) and weighs 39.12 g (1.380 oz).[1] Its purpose is not understood because of a lack of period documentation.”
“Conventional ideas
Some think the Saqqara Bird may be a ceremonial object because the falcon, the bird after which the Saqqara Bird is modeled, is the form most commonly used to represent several of the most important gods of Egyptian mythology, most notably the falcon deity Horus and the sun deity Ra Horakhty. Others have posited it may have been a toy for an elite child, or that it could have functioned as a weather vane. Some have also speculated it may have been used as a sort of boomerang, as such technology was common and well known in ancient Egypt in the form of a throwing stick used for hunting waterfowl.[2] Another hypothesis is that this bird was positioned on the masthead of sacred boats used during the Opet Festival.[3] Reliefs showing those boats are found in the Temple of Khonsu at Karnak and date to the late New Kingdom.”
“Controversial ideas
Some have suggested that the Saqqara Bird may represent evidence that knowledge of the principles of aviation existed many centuries before such are generally believed to have first been discovered. Egyptian physician, archaeologist and parapsychologist Khalil Messiha has speculated that the ancient Egyptians developed the first aircraft.[5] In spite of these claims, however, no ancient Egyptian aircraft have ever been found, nor has any other evidence suggesting their existence come to light. As a result, the theory that the Saqqara Bird is a model of a flying machine is not accepted by mainstream Egyptologists. Richard P. Hallion notes that it is "far too heavy and unstable itself to fly.”
>> I actually agree partially with both the conventional idea and the unconventional idea.
It all depends on the perspective or point of view = from which angle you see this. If you take this object individually, on its own, then I lean on it being a child’s toy. But if we see this in a bigger context = looking at the bigger picture, then yes, this artifact can be considered as the first “aircraft” – sort of speak. The work done on this artifact, the precision in the carving and the shape, everything about it is remarkable.
We cannot rule out this artifact because of the big picture. If the Helicopter Hieroglyph didn’t exist centuries before, I would have considered the Saqqara Bird as a coincidence. But since the Heli Glyph exists, we cannot rule this one out. Anons shouldn’t forget how old Saqqara’s site is.
If anons lean towards the conventional or unconventional idea about this artifact; either way, it doesn’t matter because both have a common point = FLIGHT. Either it’s a toy or a small replica of an airplane, they both represent the same thing = FLYING = FLIGHT = the ability to FLY. And this is the importance of this artifact. The next article is well written.
https://www.ancient-origins.net/unexplained-phenomena/he-saqqara-bird-did-ancient-egyptians-know-how-fly-0010035
-
Page 100 –