>>11558858

(Please read from the start)

“Tiwanaku sculpture is comprised typically of blocky, column-like figures with huge, flat square eyes, and detailed with shallow relief carving. They are often holding ritual objects, such as the Ponce Stela or the Bennett Monolith. Some have been found holding severed heads, such as the figure on the Akapana, who possibly represents a puma-shaman. These images suggest the culture practiced ritual human beheading. As additional evidence, headless skeletons have been found under the Akapana.”

>> It’s possible the cut-off heads are part of ancestor worship rituals, just like what we’ve seen with the Nasca culture (page 400).

And yes, it’s possible to transport the stones via reed boats. I’m curious to see what type of REED BOATS it’s all about = maybe something close to the Kuphar? Well, I did check it out and it turned out to be the type of boats anons see in the picture I’ve attached with this page. It’s NOT my little Kuphar for sure, but this proved 2 things:

1 – Reed or similar light material boats can float and be used in navigation. A FACT that was vehemently denied/rejected when it comes to the kuphar, but over here, it’s accepted (starting page 15). For those whom are not convinced of the kuphar, just compare texts (= information) and pictures. Only the shape is different. Jacques de Morgan arguments (pages 23-24) go down the drain.

2 – These reed boats are sturdy enough and stable enough in current Bolivia to be able to transport stones weighing tones. But despite the FACT that we have iconography of the same thing happening in Mesopotamia (page 19 = Assyrian relief); it is caterogly denied and absolutly rejected that the Kuphar is capable of transporting VERY HEAVY objects. Anons whom are reading this thread from the start know what I’m talking about here.

So anons, tell me, am I right or am I wrong in what I’ve been talking about and presenting in this thread? Just think logically: we have the same thing happening in 2 different parts of the world with 2 very different civilizations= transporting very heavy stones by means of reed boats. But one is accepted and adopted as being true, while the other is rejected and dismissed as impossible or silly. Ask yourselves why? Why is there is a difference in the respond/behavior? The answer is in pages 25-26.

The answer is that the reed boat of the Tiwanaku doesn’t lead to an Ark stuck on a high mountain, while the kuphar lead me straight to Noah’s Ark on Mt. Ararat = A secret (((they))) don’t want the rest of us to find out about. And just like what I said in page 18 = this is like a Matryoshka doll, but in reverse: going from a small secret to a bigger one.

Then ask yourselves why do we see the Caucasian BLOOD or should I say GENES in the remains of some of the Andean cultures? Like….the elongated skulls of the Paracas culture (starting page 393) for example, or the theory of the alternative origin of the Olmecs (starting page 231), and there is also “blond” Chachapoyas (page 457). It’s all linked. Remember the Armenian Genocide (pages 31-32)? It’s all connected.

The puzzle pieces are starting to come together, slowly, but surely. I hope some anons reading this have started to get a general picture. My initial thoughts were probably where you are at this stage of the research = the Europeans, maybe the Vikings, discovered the Americas way before Columbus did. Well, I thought so too, back then. I even thought of the possibility of Europeans crossing the Berin strait by foot. That is until I found the piece that has been ELUDING me for many DECADES, a piece of the puzzle which connected the big chunks together. Because of this piece, I understood that my initial thoughts were incorrect. Something else: I’ve already provided a few clues about it, the rest is on its way as I progress.

• Page 478 –

>>11575232

(Please read from the start)

“Other arts

The people of Tiwanaku also made ceramics and textiles, composed of bright colors and stepped patterns. Common textile forms included tapestries and tunics. An important ceramic artifact is the qiru, a drinking cup that was ritually smashed after ceremonies and placed with other goods in burials. Over time, the style of ceramics changed. The earliest ceramics were "coarsely polished, deeply incised brownware and a burnished polychrome incised ware". Later the Qeya style became popular during the Tiwanaku III phase, "Typified by vessels of a soft, light brown ceramic paste". These ceramics included libation bowls and bulbous-bottom vases.[26] The Staff God was a common motif in Tiwanaku art.

The effigy objects typically depicted herders, trophy heads, sacrificial victims, and felines, such as puma and jaguars. Such small, portable objects of ritual religious meaning were a key to spreading religion and influence from the main site to the satellite centers. They were created in wood, engraved bone, and cloth and included incense burners, carved wooden hallucinogenic snuff tablets, and human portrait vessels.[27] Like those of the Moche, Tiwanaku portraits expressed individual characteristics.[28] One of the best collections of Tiwanaku human effigy vessels was found on the island of Pariti, a pilgrimage center in Lake Titicaca. These vessels bear individualistic human likenesses and reveal much information about Tiwanaku clothing and jewellery styles. Radiocarbon dating revealed that they were interred in the ground between 900 and 1050 AD, so they were probably broken as part of a ritual abandonment of the island's temple by local elites and pilgrims during the collapse of the Tiwanaku state.”

>> I’m not going to go there again with the Griffin and the “birds of prey” gear that I’ve talked about many times before. But this time around, we have an addition = we have an entire felines body + head (not eagle head), but it only has wings. This is interesting isn’t it anons? A winged feline = should I put it in the category of military gear equipment, the religious ceremonial category, the clan heraldic category or maybe in the fantasy animal category, like the Serpopard (page 119)? This one is tricky.

Also the Llama carved bones, notice the dots and the X = you think those are tattoos under the belt and on the legs? Also they kinda look “robotic” don’t they? They remind me of the Valdivia culture sculptures (page 351). Don’t get me wrong here. I’m not saying these are robots or androinds or whatever these things are called. I’m saying the sculpting design is similar, mostly with the symetrical and parallel lines.

• Page 479 –