>>12103331

(Please read from the start)

>> I’ve said this many times before in this thread: if you take one artifact or structure on its own, it can be easily “debunked” or cast aside. But if you look at the global picture, we start having another image. Just like what I did with the Med Sea and the Flood: I gathered the evidence, from the Flood traces on Giza plateau, to Fossiles all over the Med and in high altitude, from the volcanic activity and the rift of the Red Sea and of course how the piece of land between Tunisia and Italy sunk….I gathered the pieces and put them together….and it happened to be that I also have a fossilized Ark trapped on Mount Ararat….and it happened to be that the Kuphar was used to navigate down the Euphrates which happened to be the craddle of the Epic of Gilgamesh, mentioning the Great Flood, just happens to exist. Coincidence after coincidence after coincidence! So I’m doing the same with the FLIGHT idea anons, but this time, I’m going global, worldwide, not just with the Flood but with other pieces of the puzzle….Once everything is in place, I can bring them together to explain what happened.

“The Question of the Quimbaya Artifacts

We currently do not have any evidence of airplanes or flying machines built by the Nazca, only these dubious lines and symbols that some modern people think look mechanical or resemble modern features such as runways. There is no solid evidence for crashed airplanes or airplane parts. There is also no evidence for buildings that may have served as hangers or airports nearby the supposed runways. Absence of evidence may not be evidence of absence, but it is not evidence either.”

Proponents of this theory also point to the Tolima or Quimbaya artifacts. The Quimbaya culture made many gold artifacts representing frogs, birds, insects, fish, and other animals. A few of them have fins and delta-shaped wings - which have led some people to suggest that these particular figures are ancient depictions of airplanes.”

>> The good part in what was said is that they started to bring 2 pieces of the puzzle together: “Nazca airplane runway design geoglyphs” and the Quimbaya artifacts = both represent the idea of FLIGHT, regardless if we agree if humans could or not fly in the past.

“The problem is that even the figures that resemble airplanes basically look like stylized versions of animal figurines. There is no sharp distinction between the ones that resemble airplanes and ones that are clearly animals. It may just be that some art styles of the Quimbaya happened to produce things that resemble items in our modern culture rather than them being an actual depiction of ancient flying machines.”

• Page 567 –

>>12116097

(Please read from the start)

>> Well, that used to be a problem for me too to figure out, but that is if you take the Quimbaya on their own and neglect the other pieces we have. Like what pieces? Like the Birds of Prey headgear designs I’ve been talking about in this thread = I believe those are individual mancrafts; no collective aircrafts like the airplanes we have nowadays. You think the idea is odd, but it’s not. In many Hollywood movies, over the decades, the individual mancraft has been presented to the public many times, inlucing in the Avengers (Falcon, Iron Man, etc) as I’ve cited before and if I remember correctly, there was even a James Bond movie with one in it. Even amateurs try to fly using one of their own invention. Just do a little search online anons and you will see what I mean there = they are called the Jet Suits or Jet Pack. I believe this is another technology hidden from us by (((them))). And (((they))) throw it in our faces via movies. Strange how we accept such ideas coming from movies but if a person came out and made a hypothesis about it to the public, the media and (((their))) “experts” quickly debunk it and attack that person, ruining the life of that person. It’s like we are kept inside a fantasy world woven by (((them))) specially to blind us.

The best clue or should I say hint we had came from the cartoon called the Mysterious Cities of Gold, with the plane shaped like the Gondor (p. 336). Anoher hint to support this comes from the movie Stargate, when you look at the small warplanes used by Ra's soldiers to bomb the miners/ slaves village, those aircrafts were also shaped like birds (p. 205). So Anons, if individual flying gear were shaped like birds, why not the ancient airplanes were also shaped like birds? Is it that hard to accept and imagine it? Also, the individual headgear we’ve seen were not just designed as Birds of Preys, there were also a FEW with Feline designs; remember the Griffin? So this means it was not just one type of animal design used, but many. I’m thinking the body gear is the same, but the helmet shape is either a feline or a bird of prey = coat of arms = belonging to different military factions.

“It is true that some people have created gliders based on the Tolima artifacts which successfully flew, but the scaled-up versions of the artifacts had to be significantly modified in order to fly - which makes it less likely that the original artifacts represent models of actual aircraft.”

>> So when these were replicated on a bigger scale, they flew… what a remarkable piece of engineering!

“Attempts have been made to create flying machines throughout history before the Wright brothers or the first hot air balloon flight in 1783. Particularly well-known stories are from ancient China, the Islamic world, and Medieval Europe. However, there doesn’t appear to be evidence of widespread flight before the 18th century. It may have happened, but it will require more evidence than ambiguous geoglyphs and figurines that resemble modern technological devices or runways for airplanes. What will confirm ancient human flight would be evidence of actual aircraft.”

>> I agree, just 2 pieces of the puzzle won’t do; this is why I’m gathering as much as I can in this thread. But even after I gather most, we can still consider them to some degree circumstential, if the reader is still having a hard time accepting the idea that flying machinery existed before the XVIIIth century. Then, I’m going to add my “spices” in the mix.

• Page 568 –