Here’s the censored Michelle Malkin video…
archive offline
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Ktv8q2BsDs
i do wonder about presidential records act.
hoping it would apply to not alter or delete Potus tweets.
Top Member Of Supreme Court Bar Resigns, Cites Bias For Trump
(projection at its best–think mirror, calls conservative justices activists, seems like a made for dems/msm ploy from this)
Dear Chief Justice Roberts:
I hereby resign my membership in the Supreme Court Bar.
This was not an easy decision. I have been a member of the Supreme Court Bar since 1972, far longer than you have, and appeared before the Court, both in person and on briefs, on several occasions as Deputy and First Deputy Attorney General of Hawaii before being appointed as a Hawaii District Court judge in 1986. I have a high regard for the work of the Federal Judiciary and taught the Federal Courts course at the University of Hawaii Richardson School of Law for a decade in the 1980s and 1990s. This due regard spanned the tenures of Chief Justices Warren, Burger, and Rehnquist before your appointment and confirmation in 2005. I have not always agreed with the Court’s decisions, but until recently I have generally seen them as products of mainstream legal reasoning, whether liberal or conservative. The legal conservatism I have respected– that of, for example, Justice Lewis Powell, Alexander Bickel or Paul Bator– at a minimum enshrined the idea of stare decisis and eschewed the idea of radical change in legal doctrine for political ends.
I can no longer say that with any confidence. You are doing far more— and far worse– than “calling balls and strikes.” You are allowing the Court to become an “errand boy” for an administration that has little respect for the rule of law.
The Court, under your leadership and with your votes, has wantonly flouted established precedent. Your “conservative” majority has cynically undermined basic freedoms by hypocritically weaponizing others. The ideas of free speech and religious liberty have been transmogrified to allow officially sanctioned bigotry and discrimination, as well as to elevate the grossest forms of political bribery beyond the ability of the federal government or states to rationally regulate it. More than a score of decisions during your tenure have overturned established precedents—some more than forty years old– and you voted with the majority in most. There is nothing “conservative” about this trend. This is radical “legal activism” at its worst.
Without trying to write a law review article, I believe that the Court majority, under your leadership, has become little more than a result-oriented extension of the right wing of the Republican Party, as vetted by the Federalist Society. Yes, politics has always been a factor in the Court’s history, but not to today’s extent. Even routine rules of statutory construction get subverted or ignored to achieve transparently political goals. The rationales of “textualism” and “originalism” are mere fig leaves masking right wing political goals; sheer casuistry.
Your public pronouncements suggest that you seem concerned about the legitimacy of the Court in today’s polarized environment. We all should be. Yet your actions, despite a few bromides about objectivity, say otherwise.
It is clear to me that your Court is willfully hurtling back to the cruel days of Lochner and even Plessy. The only constitutional freedoms ultimately recognized may soon be limited to those useful to wealthy, Republican, White, straight, Christian, and armed males— and the corporations they control. This is wrong. Period. This is not America.
I predict that your legacy will ultimately be as diminished as that of Chief Justice Melville Fuller, who presided over both Plessy and Lochner. It still could become that of his revered fellow Justice John Harlan the elder, an honest conservative, but I doubt that it will. Feel free to prove me wrong.
The Supreme Court of the United States is respected when it wields authority and not mere power. As has often been said, you are infallible because you are final, but not the other way around.
I no longer have respect for you or your majority, and I have little hope for change. I can’t vote you out of office because you have life tenure, but I can withdraw whatever insignificant support my Bar membership might seem to provide.
Please remove my name from the rolls.
With deepest regret,
James Dannenberg
https://conservativebrief.com/top-member-of-supreme-court-bar-resigns-cites-bias-for-trump-20460/
my thoughts as i looked at name.
Adam Schiff EXPOSED
(concise summary of what we know, also cites msm who criticized him for lying)
The Democrats resident liar in chief, House Intelligence Committee Chair Rep. Adam Schiff has been exposed as a liar and it was the mainstream media that did it.
For months Schiff promoted the idea that there was evidence of collusion with President Donald Trump and Russia.
Many in the media had him on their shows as he used this lie to advance his own career and make himself a star.
But now that he has been exposed as having known from the start that there was no evidence of collusion, the same media is hammering him.
The Wall Street Journal Editorial Board said “Americans expect that politicians will lie, but sometimes the examples are so brazen that they deserve special notice. Newly released Congressional testimony shows that Adam Schiff spread falsehoods shamelessly about Russia and Donald Trump for three years even as his own committee gathered contrary evidence.
“The House Intelligence Committee last week released 57 transcripts of interviews it conducted in its investigation into Russia’s meddling in the 2016 election. The committee probe started in January 2017 under then-Chair Devin Nunes and concluded in March 2018 with a report finding no evidence that the Trump campaign conspired with the Kremlin. Most of the transcripts were ready for release long ago, but Mr. Schiff oddly refused to release them after he became chairman in 2019. He only released them last week when the White House threatened to do it first.
“Now we know why. From the earliest days of the collusion narrative, Mr. Schiff insisted that he had evidence proving the plot. In March 2017 on MSNBC, Mr. Schiff teased that he couldn’t “go into particulars, but there is more than circumstantial evidence now.”
[…]
“None of this was true, and Mr. Schiff knew it. In July 2017, here’s what former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper told Mr. Schiff and his colleagues: “I never saw any direct empirical evidence that the Trump campaign or someone in it was plotting/conspiring with the Russians to meddle with the election.” Three months later, former Obama Attorney General Loretta Lynch agreed that while she’d seen “concerning” information, “I don’t recall anything being briefed up to me.” Former Deputy AG Sally Yates concurred several weeks later: “We were at the fact-gathering stage here, not the conclusion stage.”
“The same goes for the FBI agents who started the collusion probe in 2016. Most remarkable, former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe admitted the bureau’s reason for opening the case was nonsense. Asked in December 2017 why the FBI obtained a secret surveillance warrant on former Trump aide Carter Page, rather than on George Papadopoulos (whose casual conversation with a foreign diplomat was the catalyst for the probe), Mr. McCabe responded: “Papadopoulos’ comment didn’t particularly indicate that he was the person that had had—that was interacting with the Russians.” No one else was either,” it said.
Schiff faced a similar condemnation from The Boston herald who said, “Disinformation from Schiff, media damaged America.”
The game is done for Schiff and his cronies. They know it and the walls have started to close in. Schiff could find himself removed from Congress if the media does its job.
The biggest part of the scandal is the evidence that it stretched to former President Obama who called a January 5, 2017 meeting to keep the Russia investigation a secret.
And part of the plan was coordinated media leaks, which was Schiff’s role, in order to get the American citizens in a Russia frenzy.
It would not be a stunner if Schiff was made the scapegoat in order to protect those who are more responsible for the hoax than he is.
https://conservativebrief.com/adam-schiff-exposed-his-career-is-done-21601/
Letitia James calls out NYPD for ‘unequal’ social distancing enforcement of minorities
(right on cue)
https://nypost.com/2020/05/13/letitia-james-calls-out-nypd-for-unequal-social-distancing-enforcement-of-minorities/
https://twitter.com/RealCandaceO
agree
watching the libs/Ds actions truly reminds me of behaviors i witnessed during childhood.
i mean that sincerely, most people grow up and evolve to a higher sense of purpose in a spirit of cooperation and respect.
these people do not, they seem like a lower life form that never evolved.