Anonymous ID: b0b8f4 May 17, 2020, 8:48 a.m. No.9211421   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1452

>>9211296

if you endorse passing laws to restrict religious and political freedom then you are anit-consititution. its the exact same tactic used by the enemy to suppress Christianity and nationalism in america. not to mention the fact that simply banning and ideology doesnt even work, in fact it has the opposite affect, igniting passionate support due to the victimization of ideas. this is what has happened with MAGA. a lot of the normies who were on the fence are now pro MAGA due simply to the effect the communist policies have had on their lives. if you want to defeat an ideology, you must counter it with better ideas, you cant regulate them. this has been near impossible lately with the bias media, but things are changing, and we are winning in the court of public opinion, with out regulating one single idea, or suppressing one single ideology. we are simply winning because the playing field has been leveled, and now that people see the truth about MAGA, they are choosing it over communism. thats how you win.

Anonymous ID: b0b8f4 May 17, 2020, 8:58 a.m. No.9211509   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1555

>>9211452

>anti-comminunism laws just protect us from those that want to subvert our Constitution

 

that statement is true, but by definition, it violates the constitution. you cant just pass laws to defeat your enemy. you have to be better and smarter than that. also…stop saying "we all know.." you dont speak for anons.if you cant defeat your enemy on an even playing field, and instead attempt to make their opinions illegal, you're no worse than the enemy. you cant justify legally regulating ideas, and claim its in support of the constitution. its completely contradictory.

Anonymous ID: b0b8f4 May 17, 2020, 9:13 a.m. No.9211660   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1679

>>9211555

its not a commie interpretation anon and im not familiar with the SCOTUS ruling you're referencing. its a legal interpretation of the constitution. the freedoms of expression, be it political, religious or otherwise CANNOT be infringed. if you pass laws to infringe on them, its in violation of the constitution. period. which means you have to find other means of defeating oppressive ideologies. this is now possible with the bias media being exposed, but has not been possible for a long time because the enemy has been using the exact policies that you are advocating to suppress you and me. the constitution is a weapon of freedom. point it at your enemy, not at yourself. because if you attempt to violate the constitution to defeat the enemy, they will do the same to you. rendering it nothing but an old piece of paper with some good ideas on it that nobody cares about anymoar

Anonymous ID: b0b8f4 May 17, 2020, 9:17 a.m. No.9211694   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1797

>>9211679

>Any idealogy that seeks to undermine that freedom is subject to be outlawed as being incompatible with our way of life

 

that statement is false. according to the constitution itself. read it.