>>919871

So now it's out there. This is in the NYT so this becomes the official description of the components of the conspiracy theory. Now we wait, and one by one, these elements will be reported on in other news stories, and people with these ideas in their head, associated with a mad conspiracy theory, will have to wake up, little by little, and notice that there is evidence that this is not a theory at all.

But more than that, this is evidence that WE THE PEOPLE can actually take a conspiracy theory mainstream. And now that this one conspiracy theory is mainstream, we have an opening to discuss other such theories with people.

Do not let people get out of a discussion by saying "it's a conspiracy theory". Point out that all theories are only theories until there are enough facts available. Point out that whenever a detective investigates a crime, they begin with a theory and then look to see whether the facts support the theory or not. Point out that this is the rational approach. Use the elements of this Times article as a framework for a discussion.

Is there any evidence that children are being freed? Because the MSM has covered this up, many people will agree that the theory is nonsense. But, there is a lot of evidence out there that sex traffickers have been arrested and children have been freed. Even some of it on the DOJ website. So this is the time to be systematic.

Extract the elements of the conspiracy theory from the Times article

For each element, hunt for evidence that it is not theory, but fact.

Draw a map to the evidence, showing element by element, the strength of the evidence.

Use the map to structure a discussion

The very term "conspiracy theory" should lead to a rational discussion because all rational investigations form theories and use those as a framework to investigate. It is irrational to DISMISS A THEORY

>>921191

This is not going to discredit her. The audience that reads her will just be reinforced by these attacks.

Besides, we WANT liberals to believe Goldberg's oped about this conspiracy theory. If they believe it, then we can talk to them about it. If we can talk to them, then there is the possibility to crack their belief system.

Ask questions like "What about that bust in Jan in LA where they arrested 500 sex traffickers and freed 56 women, 11 of whom were underage? That is a fact isn't it? Don't facts mean that the theory is true?"

http:// abc7.com/hundreds-arrested-in-human-trafficking-crackdown-in-ca/3007899/

The oped gives us an in for discussions. The Socratic method gets around their barriers to accepting info from a crazed right-wing Trump supporter. And a solid understanding of actual events like the LA arrests, provides the raw material for Socratic questions.

You can ask a liberal: Don't you even care about girls who are held in slavery by sex traffickers? Why won't you even look into the facts? Why do you say that Trump is an idiot in one breath and then say that won't look on the Internet for these facts because you think is is Fake News. Isn't that what Trump is always saying? How can you follow Trump's ideas on the one hand and haye him on the other?

>>921832

Are you serious???

Two rings and a zipper does not make a Q

And a smart woman who talks well and can think on her feet, is not the kind of person that goes into military intelligence or strategy.

The people in Q are deep thinkers, more likely quiet, and used to keeping their mouth shut because… intelligence.

It takes all kinds of people to run a government.