>>9214261 Not sure of the meaning of the mask, in her particular instance. It follows that her wearing that mask outside, was a group decision. So…showing citizens that we feel their pain with the mask thing? Playing it close to the edge as events move along in close locked mortal combat with the beast? Meaning the situation is very complicated.

In any event, this anon has not worn a mask, not even once, and does not intend to do so. Further, my movements/activities have not been affected by anything a DS governor says. So there is that….am expecting the no-mask segment to grow as we drive forward and liberate Paris, so to speak.

>>9214424 Did you read my post?

>>9214488 TY, onward.

>>9214591 Re Falzarano payback: Have been wondering about that very thing.

>>9214820 That lack of intellectual curiosity makes them complicit, to varying degrees, in the unprecedented crimes of the animals they follow. Completely ignoring what was said to them, as if it never happened, and jumping immediately to a different subject. Because cognitive dissonance. If a response does actually come from such, it is sure to be a MSM propaganda phrase, which to their minds, constitutes a deeply persuasive argument. If presented with an excellent reply to the statement, most will then retreat from that slight clash. It is a rare "liberal" who will actually stand and fight, mind vs. mind.

>>9214979 Have been going up against them for about 50 years. In that entire time, only TWO stood and fought. Both of them deeply insane and angry about it.