>>9212238 /pb Q posts

ThanQ so very much fren. The site had already been dealt with by the dark ones by the time I got up and yours was the first post providing the "archived offline" info I opened.

Came across something that startled me a bit - pic related - that brought up some questions I would love someone, anyone, in government - on either side of the freedom/communism debate - to answer.

Seems the 'lawyers' at the NSA believe "their" little "statutes" outweigh Presidential Executive Orders! Now…how the hell did that happen? When did lawyers at the NSA become the rulers of America? When were 'in house' rules made by un-elected nobodies seemingly responsible to no-one ordained as the "Law of the Land" in America? When did 'in house' rules and statutes at the NSA - an organization owned and funded by the American Taxpayer - become supreme OVER the Constitution?

Just sort of asking for a few hundred million frens!

>>9212247 /pb

To paraphrase JFK - secrets in government are abhorrent! Who made the decision that the employers of every single person in the American intelligence community - did not have the same right to see who, what, where, when, why…and how, treason, sedition, corruption were committed, as does the person/persons who made the decision to not let their employers - The PEOPLE - see the information?

Most certainly: