Anonymous ID: d30014 May 17, 2020, 12:14 p.m. No.9214251   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>9213862 (pb)

Specifically WHICH constitutional rights are being violated and by who? Criminals not being prosecuted? Arguing about a lack of evidence?

 

Go look up how leftists argue about the city of Jericho and their reasoning for it not being the city destroyed by Joshua. Garstang was right, ALL of the elements required to fulfill Jericho as being the one conquered by Joshua are there, but then along came Dame Kathleen Kenyon who said it couldn't be because it lacked the Cypriot pottery that should have been there for that time period. She was right, SHE didn't find any, but it WAS later found.

 

  • https://biblearchaeologyreport.com/2019/05/17/biblical-places-three-ways-to-date-the-destruction-at-jericho/

 

Leftists do this kind of shit all the time.

 

Argument from ignorance

Argument from ignorance (from Latin: argumentum ad ignorantiam), also known as appeal to ignorance (in which ignorance represents "a lack of contrary evidence"), is a fallacy in informal logic. It asserts that a proposition is true because it has not yet been proven false or a proposition is false because it has not yet been proven true. This represents a type of false dichotomy in that it excludes the possibility that there may have been an insufficient investigation to prove that the proposition is either true or false.[1] It also does not allow for the possibility that the answer is unknowable, only knowable in the future, or neither completely true nor completely false.[2] In debates, appeals to ignorance are sometimes used in an attempt to shift the burden of proof. In research, low-power experiments are subject to false negatives (there would have been an observable effect if there had been a larger sample size or better experimental design) and false positives (there was an observable effect; however, this was a coincidence due purely to random chance, or the events correlate, but there is no cause-effect relationship). The term was likely coined by philosopher John Locke in the late 17th century.[3][4]

 

  • https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_ignorance