Anonymous ID: 05d69b May 17, 2020, 2:35 p.m. No.9215867   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>9215816

"Regard this" … the prescription was a suggestion to the pharmacist … not an absolute order. The pharmacist was not subservient to the doctor … he was an equal, The doc would say "This person has lumpy shit, I suggest eye of newt." The pharmacist would say "I've found toe of frog and two Ave Maria's work better." … and that is what the pharmacist would dispense.

Anonymous ID: 05d69b May 17, 2020, 2:56 p.m. No.9216133   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6153

>>9215981

> then there wouldn't be a constitutional issue.

Marbury v Madison might disagree … any law which does not confine itself to the 4 corners of the constitution is not a law at all.