1/2
Going back some fifty years great social riffs began between the genders. They were largely orchestrated, funded and controlled by a facet of the Deep State, that QAnon supporters and other patriots call the, “Clowns In America,” a.k.a. the C_A, a.k.a. the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), has near total control over the movement we call, “Feminism.” And by all accounts they still have significant control over numerous women’s groups; if not all of them.
Around 1971 a forward thinking woman named, Erin Pizzey sought to provide shelter for the abused; men, women and children. In her wisdom she knew there must be separate facilities for the men and women. And so she built them. Shortly after the completion of the shelters the new CIA funded and controlled “women’s movement” demanded the men’s shelter be closed.
Mrs. Pizzey resisted only to have her dog murdered and her children terrorized. The CIA’s Feminists would not cease the violence against Erin Pizzey and her family until she closed the men’s shelter. Why?
From the beginning of the shelter movement to this very day the CIA controlled women’s groups have demanded there be no shelters or health programs for men. Claiming there is no need for men to have any. In spite of the fact that over 40 years of Academic and Scholarly research clearly substantiates that the need for health and emergency support systems is entirely equal between men and women.
This is supported by research, with an aggregate sample size in the reviewed studies that exceeds 370,000. Presented here in an annotated bibliography of some of the research titled,
“References Examining Assaults By Women On Their Spouses Or Male Partners: An Annotated Bibliography"
https://web.csulb.edu/~mfiebert/assault.htm
Nearly every thing we have been told about Partner Violence (PV) is untrue and mostly based on Scientific Fraud. Among the concerns that bring about the need for emergency support systems is perpetration. The CIA’s women’s groups had laws passed that let them guide statistics however they needed to indicated men were the primary perpetrators.
Joan Arehart-Treichel’s reports in, “Men Shouldn’t Be Overlooked as Victims of Partner Violence,” findings from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) regarding perpetration of partner violence. The 2001 study shows that half of partner violence is reciprocally violent and that more women than men were responsible for instigating nonreciprocal partner violence, 71 percent to 29 percent respectively.
https://psychnews.psychiatryonline.org/doi/full/10.1176%2Fpn.42.15.0031a
From the study, “Thirty Years of Denying the Evidence on Gender Symmetry in Partner Violence: Implications for Prevention and Treatment.”
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Murray_Straus/publication/233717660_Thirty_Years_of_Denying_the_Evidence_on_Gender_Symmetry_in_Partner_Violence_Implications_for_Prevention_and_Treatment/links/54ef34ea0cf25f74d721bf2c/Thirty-Years-of-Denying-the-Evidence-on-Gender-Symmetry-in-Partner-Violence-Implications-for-Prevention-and-Treatment.pdf
“In December 2005, the National Institute of Justice invited grant proposals to investigate PV and sexual violence. It stated that studies involving men victims are not eligible for funding .”[emphasis added]
“It is time to make the effort to end all family violence, not just violence against women partners, because this is morally and legally necessary and because it is crucial to protect women. This must include PV by women, which is widely viewed as mostly harmless (Greenblat, 1983), because physical injury inflicted by women is more rare than physical injury inflicted by men (Stets & Straus, 1990). On the contrary, even when attacks by women result in no physical injury, ending PV by women is a basic prevention step to reduce violence against women and all other humans. '''The research shows that this so-called harmless violence by women because a meta-analysis by Stith and colleagues (2004) found that a woman’s perpetration of violence was the strongest predictor of her being a victim of partner violence’’’. (citations: 1, 2, 3)” [emphasis added]