>>9223114

I think it clearly has to be a group of people:

Why did [CLAS 1-99] organize and push propaganda [smear] campaign through use of MSM & Hollywood?

[CLAS 1-99][F]

[CLAS 1-99][F]

[CLAS 1-99][F]

[CLAS 1-99][F]

[CLAS 1-99]

[CLAS 1-99]

[CLAS 1-99]

[CLAS 1-99]

[CLAS 1-99] x 49

>>9223140

That list is not necessarily all inclusive. We don't know.

>>9223171

>>9223162

If CLAS 1-99 is a list of offences, how does a list of offences, "organize and push propaganda [smear] campaign through use of MSM & Hollywood?"

>>9223191

See…

>>9223193

>>9223205

Here again, I don't see how that theory jives with Q #4196

>Why did [CLAS 1-99] organize and push propaganda [smear] campaign through use of MSM & Hollywood?

>>9223222

Holy shit… I've got to GK myself…. ouch.

>jives

jibes

>>9223300

Actually, would have a slightly opposite meaning. To jive is to kid or mislead in American English.

>>9223357

They broke down and put "irregardless" in the dictionary. Sadly, if people use it; it becomes a word.

>>9223479

KEK! It's been a minute since I heard that, anon.

>>9223515

(saved)

Very nice, anon!