>Why did the USSS protect Hussein and not kill him instead???
Because that's their fucking job.
Even if you hate the mfer you still do your job.
So, using this logic, should a Dim USSS agent take out POTUS today?
>Grassley takes back his position as chair on the committee in Nov.
Sauce?
The only sauce I've seen so far is an article from Fall '19 that said Grassley would take back over next Congressional term/session.
We're in that time frame now and Lindsey is still Chairman.
Ok, I stand corrected now that I've read the key part again:
"Grassley’s role as chairman would depend on Republicans keeping the Senate in 2020."
This means Grassley wouldn't take over unless R's hold the Senate after the 11/2020 election.
Which means it would be the new term that begins on 01/2021.
So, if nothing can happen Senate-wise until Chuck takes over… that means nothing happens until 2021.
Well, DOJ actions via Barr/Durham takes precedence over the Senate.
Thus, anything Grassley would have planned should be after the fact.
Unless we're talking nothing happens until 2021 which is not gonna go over well here.
Exactly.
And, kind of defeats the purpose of Q drops hinting that the D's re-taking the House (Senate was they key) was part of The Plan for that very purpose.
>Bad greentext again.
kek didn't have any this time
The USSS is designed to protect (except for the weird side gig investigating counterfeiters), but…
You bring up a good point.
What is (if any) their legal obligation to report on illegal actions they observe when doing their job?
Also, if they see the POTUS is banging some side piece are they allowed to mention it or do they have to stfu and keep i to themselves?
>barber for all tomorrow am
kek many such cases
Mine reopens tomorrow, but get this, in addition to the usual masks required & social distancing while waiting… they also are requiring info be given so they can do contact tracing.
Looks like I'll be a hippy for a little while longer.