>>9223764 (/pb) ………….. cont'd

>>9212171 (/pb) …………… Q4257 "Review of the Unauthorized Disclosures of Former National Security Agency Contractor EDWARD SNOWDEN"

The fact he told his fellow employees conflicting stories of where he would be during his 'leave of absence', and that his rereview did not even include his record at the C_A, especially the ex-post facto UPDATE to the 'Scattered Castles' database, which occurred AFTER he supposedly left the C_A and AFTER the NSA queried it for the purposes of clearing his security, the contents of that update remain redacted in this declassified document, which was important enough for the Committee to conclude it may have affected whether the NSA hired him in the first place (Committee document uses the phrase "it is unclear whether NSA would have treated Snowden's onboarding any differently", which to me is code for the Committee saying holy shit but they have to remain discreet and professional, and the fact that during his time with NSA contractor Dell he told everyone he had moral issues with the C_A (despite there being no record of complaints while he was there), all of these facts lead me to strongly suspect the following:

Once Snowden secured a role with NSA contractor Perot Systems (who then sponsored him for higher level of clearance with the NSA, and he was approved on March 31, 2009, and after supposedly 'quitting' the C_A, that Snowden was then trained by and had to sign a NDA with, the C_A to conduct clandestine counter-intelligence activities against the NSA, as a 'non-official' cover operative of the C_A all along.

In June 12, 2012 at NSA Hawaii Snowden created a 'security patch' that was supposed to fix a vulnerability. Instead it crashed all of the servers. See screencap ES_9. I don't believe for one second that it was an honest mistake. Why? Because of the way he reacted. Textbook Alinsky/C_A projection. He blamed others for pointing out the crash he himself caused! He accused his own direct managers of "evasion and finger-pointing, rather than problem resolution."

That tells me Snowden was trained to say such a thing, to commit a felony at the behest of the C_A, and then attempt to create a narrative that puts the focus on his superiors as guilty and wrong.

I suspect that the 'crash' Snowden caused, was a deliberate and intentional attack on the NSA's data, and he tried to cover for himself by blaming others at the NSA, to smear their reputations and distract from what he did.

The pattern exactly matches the Obama gang of farm graduates.