>>9224416

Q# 1287

Q

!xowAT4Z3VQ

27 Apr 2018 - 5:27:33 PM

Cohen raid by FBI?

Public context: re: payment to Stormy Daniels?

SC & FBI raided POTUS’ attorney to pull Stormy Daniels payment info?

RR signed off?

What other docs were collected?

How many places raided?

Raid on the President of the United States’ attorney for payment details re: private case re: Stormy Daniels?

Think logically.

How do you introduce evidence into an investigation (legally)?

Who has everything?

Methods which info collected/ obtained?

Admissible in the court of law?

Insert Rudy.

First public statement.

“It shouldn’t take more than “a week or two” to come to a resolution on the probe.”

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/04/20/rudy-to-rescue-giuliani-vows-to-wrap-up-mueller-probe.html

Think resignations.

Who has the POWER?

If POTUS was in a weakened position (about to be impeached/indicted) would ‘they’ resign?

Why are we here?

Public forum.

World watching.

Sharing of intel to bad actors?

Purpose?

Not confirming SC is on /team/.

Question everything.

Timing important.

Planned?

Q

>>9224524

Military tribunals in the United States

Military tribunals in the United States are military courts designed to try members of enemy forces during wartime, operating outside the scope of conventional criminal and civil proceedings. The judges are military officers and fulfill the role of jurors. Military tribunals are distinct from courts-martial.

A military tribunal is an inquisitorial system based on charges brought by military authorities, prosecuted by a military authority, judged by military officers, and sentenced by military officers against a member of an enemy army.

The United States has made use of military tribunals or commissions, rather than rely on a court-martial, within the military justice system, during times of declared war or rebellion.

Most recently, as discussed below, the administration of George W. Bush sought to use military tribunals to try "unlawful enemy combatants", mostly individuals captured abroad and held at a prison camp at a military base at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba.

A military tribunal or commission is most usually used to refer to a court that asserts jurisdiction over persons who are members of an enemy army, are held in military custody, and are accused of a violation of the laws of war. In contrast, courts-martial generally take jurisdiction over only members of their own military. A military tribunal or commission may still use the rules and procedures of a court-martial, although that is not generally the case.

Military tribunals also, generally speaking, do not assert jurisdiction over people who are acknowledged to be civilians who are alleged to have broken civil or criminal laws. However, military tribunals are sometimes used to try individuals not affiliated with a particular state's military who are nonetheless accused of being combatants and acting in violation of the laws of war.

• https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military_tribunals_in_the_United_States

Q#4158

Q

!!Hs1Jq13jV6

8 May 2020 - 1:09:02 PM

SHADOW PRESIDENCY.

SHADOW GOVERNMENT.

INSURGENCY.

IRREGULAR WARFARE.

Q

>>9224748

5 U.S. Code § 3331.Oath of office

An individual, except the President, elected or appointed to an office of honor or profit in the civil service or uniformed services, shall take the following oath: “I, AB, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God.” This section does not affect other oaths required by law.

(Pub. L. 89–554, Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 424.)

Regarding Barr today, I can just see the media headlines running with what the shills are posting here. I wonder just how far they will take it.