>>9226447 (lb)
I was actually making the case for Barr/Durham to not go after Biden/Obama in civilian courts with criminal charges. I have to admit, I like Q's response better.
"Open your restaurants, but make certain patrons are 6 feet apart and all your folks are wearing masks".
>A lot more emotional people these days.
I like to see both sides of an issue as thoroughly as possible. It's not as if there aren't many valid reasons for that.
First of all, we know late spring/early summer (Durham). Then there's Seth Rich. Then there's JA (lots of folks love the guy). Then there's "Cures", followed by some recent posts (anons have been arguing over the appropriateness of that one if you've been paying attention). Then there's the fact that many people died from a manufactured virus when cures already existed. Then there's big pharma sponsoring studies to disprove the HCQ+Zpack cure. Then there's Satanic Hollywood worshiping something that isn't there, and the trafficking networks kidnapping, selling, raping, and eating children. Then there's the "God" stuff, and incompatibility with certain scriptures (that should be more than enough to wake a few up to religion and "holy" books).
Lots of stuff coming to a head, you know? People are anxious for good reason. All good-intentioned people want to see evil driven out, and lots of people are going to have to forcibly unplug from some very heavy indoctrination to come to the realization of exactly who's going to have to do it. If you've been following along with Q any length of time and haven't had an existential crisis yet, my opinion is, you might not be doing it right; lol. Perhaps Renaissance Humanism was on to something.
It's complicated.