Anonymous ID: 63327a May 18, 2020, 2:05 p.m. No.9229215   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9241 >>9251

>>9228455 LB

Don't you People understand its not just the WHO…A Lot Moar Involved…Pay Attention…

what country started the WTO…. And which president ….Allowed China to become a member….IF memory serves….As Q said Look here Not there

 

What Happened When China Joined the WTO?

 

The United States thought it was directing the show when China acceded to the World Trade Organization. Instead, China wrote its own script.

 

In the spring of 2000, China was trying to become a member of the World Trade Organization (WTO). The U.S. House of Representatives had just approved normalizing trade relations with China. The vote was effectively a U.S. endorsement of China’s accession, and President Bill Clinton, a major proponent of China’s bid, voiced his economic and strategic hopes for the U.S.-China relationship.

 

The WTO is the global trade rule-setting institution. It has 164 members as of 2019, and all decisions are made unanimously. It promotes freer trade by requiring all members to adhere to certain principles, emphasizing low and predictable trade barriers. In exchange, members are guaranteed better deals with other WTO member countries.

 

China wanted to join the WTO because it would allow China access to new trading partners and better rates with current ones, raising prospects for improved living standards domestically and giving China a seat at the table in a globalizing world.

 

The United States wanted something, too: for China to get on board with a U.S.-led, liberal-democratic order and move away from its communist model. But that's not quite what happened.

 

https://world101.cfr.org/global-era-issues/trade/what-happened-when-china-joined-wto

Anonymous ID: 63327a May 18, 2020, 2:10 p.m. No.9229302   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>9229241

KEK ..Ok.. if you say so…..BUT..I suggest YOU read up on it….Here I'll TRY and help you…kekekek

 

Applications open for 2020 Trade and Public Health Workshop

 

The contribution of public health policy, intellectual property rules and trade agreements to support the development and dissemination of key health technologies to fight the COVID-19 pandemic will be a special feature of this year’s Trade and Public Health Workshop, scheduled to take place in Geneva from 9 to 13 November 2020. Targeted at senior government officials, the programme will be delivered by over 30 experts. The deadline to submit applications to participate is 26 June 2020.

 

The WTO is organizing the workshop in close collaboration with the World Health Organization (WHO) and the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO).

 

The Trade and Public Health Workshop takes a holistic approach to the interlinkages between trade and public health. Its programme has evolved to cover topical and current issues, building on the experience of similar workshops organized by the WTO Secretariat since 2005 and responding to the feedback from participating officials from the WTO's member governments. It follows the approach developed in the WHO-WIPO-WTO Trilateral Study on “Promoting Access to Medical Technologies and Innovation: Intersections Between Public Health, Intellectual Property and Trade”.

 

The COVID-19 pandemic has triggered an unprecedented global public health crisis and exemplifies the need for global cooperation. The Trade and Public Health Workshop will address the need for coherent policy responses on the basis of a practical understanding of the interaction between public health, trade agreements and the intellectual property (IP) system.

 

https://www.wto.org/english/news_e/news20_e/heal_15may20_e.htm

Anonymous ID: 63327a May 18, 2020, 2:22 p.m. No.9229489   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9505

>>9229251

Agreed …And it looks like Trump and Q-Team are doing just that….It won't happened overnight….BUT..it is happening…Slowly but surely…ITS..Happening….In Moar ways then one..kekekek

 

International Consortium of Investigative Journalists

 

World Bank’s Legal Immunity Stripped, Opening Door for Lawsuits

 

The Supreme Court of the United States has rejected World Bank claims of complete legal immunity, ruling that one of its arms can be sued in relation to lending activities.

 

The 7-1 ruling could also open other American-based international organizations to the threat of lawsuits over financing overseas development.

 

For the World Bank, it means that it now faces having to defend against a suit by members of a fishing community in Mundra, India, who contend that their homes and livelihoods were damaged by pollution from a coal power plant that was financed by the bank’s private sector lending arm, the Washington, D.C.-based International Finance Corporation.

 

https://www.icij.org/investigations/world-bank/world-banks-legal-immunity-stripped-opening-door-for-lawsuits/