two notables removed when i was trying to point to problems with just the bottom one, got the numbers backwards bc one RT'd the other:
>>9234738 The COVID Lockdown Ends When ‘We The People’ Withdraw Our Consent…
This was ok (new sundance article)
>>9234770 (article posted multiple times in qresear.ch)
both were tossed but top one was fine. reposting the other, with apologies to OP from lb
The COVID Lockdown Ends When ‘We The People’ Withdraw Our Consent…
The power of government comes from the people; or as we say in the U.S. “from the consent of the governed.” When the people lead, the politicians are forced to follow.
Without implied consent the municipal or state government has no power. None.
As a result, the lock-downs end when the majority of We The People no longer give our consent.
When the majority of people simply refuse to comply with unilateral dictates, and laugh in the faces of those who attempt to enforce them, the government no longer has power.
If one person refuses to comply government can, and likely will, intervene. However, if tens of thousands rebuke these unconstitutional decrees, there isn’t a damn thing govt can do to stop it… and they know it. This is why some state governors are quickly starting to retract or modify their dictates.
A non-compliant snowball becomes an unstoppable freedom avalanche.
Local, regional and state officials know they can control the behavior of an individual. If one barber shop opens, the owner becomes a target. However, those officials also know they cannot control the behavior of the majority. If every barber shop and beauty salon in town opens… there is absolutely nothing the government can do about it.
If one restaurant and/or bar opens, the state can target the owner. But if every bar and restaurant in town opens; and if everyone ignores and dispatches the silly dictates of the local, regional or state officials; there isn’t a damned thing they can do about it.
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2020/05/19/the-covid-lockdown-ends-when-we-the-people-withdraw-our-consent/
> fatal side effects
if it has fatal side effects, seems like a strange treatment for arthritis. really strange.
indeed. but let's hope enough people will stop listening to them.
not meant to criticize your posting of the article, just the claim that a drug would be prescribed for arthritis that has potentially fatal effects.
Yes - the more testing that's done, the smaller the % of cases leading to death. that would be why POTUS is so pleased to make sure all the states get what they need to do widespread testing.
Yahoo has a special place on my anti-Q article shit list bc they are the ones that published this widely-quoted but impossible to confirm or deny report that Qanon is considered a domestic terrorist threat by the FBI:
https://news.yahoo.com/trump-and-q-anon-one-degree-of-separation-202454679.html
Praying Medic tried hard to track it down; FBI wouldn't say yea or nay:
https://twitter.com/prayingmedic/status/1157151320786128896
This was the end of July/early Aug - just 5 days before deplatforming of 8chan.
>trying to awaken anyone with facts is useless
only works with those that are ready, not just anybody. if someone says negative things about Trump, i don't try to redpill, just say "I'm not against Trump." Next move is up to them. Unfortunately, it's not usually to ask "Why not?"
Yes, yahoo may be even worse than other MSM, flying under the radar.
>make propaganda illegal again
But guess who would be first on the chopping block? Maybe just uphold the First Amendment.