Anonymous ID: 582242 May 19, 2020, 1:45 p.m. No.9242661   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2766 >>2793 >>2818 >>2864 >>2940

1/4

 

My notes/timeline regarding NABU I've had for a while. Not comprehensive, but there are some bombshells:

 

April 22, 2014: Joe Biden went to Ukraine purportedly because of Russia, to meet with Ukraine Prime Minister Arseniy Yatsenyuk. He purportedly urges Ukraine to increase energy production to rid itself of using Russian natural gas, saying, “an American team is currently in the region working with Ukraine and its neighbors to increase Ukraine’s short-term energy supply.” Yatsenyuk welcomes American “investors” to modernize natural gas supply lines. Biden was influential in the creation of the National Anti-corruption Bureau (NABU) which would later implicate Manafort in crimes. He “pushed for the creation of an independent anti-corruption bureau to combat graft.” He offered political support and $50 million to help Yatsenyuk's new government.

 

https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2014/04/22/remarks-press-vice-president-joe-biden-and-ukrainian-prime-minister-arse

 

October, 2014: NABU was formally founded at the insistence of the U.S. State Department and Biden, joined by the International Monetary Fund and the European Commission. During the next year NABU became closely involved with the FBI.

 

April 15, 2015: Joe Biden speaks in Ukraine, praising the decision to appoint a new head of the NABU, the new Ukrainian law enforcement investigative established by the U.S.

 

December, 2015: The investigation of Burisma in regard to its licenses were transferred to NABU.

 

1/4

Anonymous ID: 582242 May 19, 2020, 1:51 p.m. No.9242766   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2793 >>2818 >>2826 >>2864 >>2940

>>9242661

 

2/4 (or more)

 

notes/timeline regarding NABU

 

NOW HERE IS SOMETHING VERY IMPORTANT:

 

January 21 - 24, 2016: Officials with the National Security Council, the FBI, the Department of Justice and the State Department (Working Group???) met with various Ukrainian authorities in Washington, D.C. to discuss their version of anti-corruption efforts (to stop people like Shokin). The discussion included reviving a closed investigation of payments allegedly made years earlier to certain U.S. figures (Manafort) by the Party of Regions, the former President Yanukovych. It is after this meeting, the "black ledger" is magically produced from hiding and made public. When the ledger was presented to the U.S. officials, they were only interested in the information on Manafort, ignoring the information about Obama White House counsel Gregory Craig who also had taken payments from Yanukovych’s party at the same time as Manafort. Also discussed, was the closure of the investigation of Burisma.The director of NABU was also present in D.C. from January 19-21 for a working visit.Coincidence??? Participating with the Working Group???

 

https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/440730-how-the-obama-white-house-engaged-ukraine-to-give-russia-collusion

 

I only add the following because it was on the same day and because it involvesGulen, of the Muslim Brotherhood:

 

Also on this day, Obama signed the executive order for the Iran Deal, finalizing it. He did not put it through congress since he knew it would not pass, while repeatedly assuring Congress he would not do it. Iran never signed it however. In addition, Obama surreptitiously gave $1.7 billion cash, delivering it on pallets from Europe. He lied about that, too, until it was revealed later in September. He continued favoring Iran over Israel. The plan to run the pipelines through Turkey had one snag, howeverErdogan. Erdogan was against Syria, but Obama was beholden to Syria since it was a close ally of Iranhence why Iran didn't sigh the deal. A coup was fomented in Turkey to remove Erdogan to fix it, Obama and the Clintons supporting Fethullah Gulen. ==Yet another snag was Flynn warning against Gulen (as part of his firm's contract for a private Dutch company, which the CIA used to frame FLYNN to boot–two birds with one stone), eventually writing an op-ed in The Hill in November. Gulen also donated to the Clinton Foundation. However, the coup would fail (April, 2017). Oopsie.

 

2/4 (or more)

Anonymous ID: 582242 May 19, 2020, 1:52 p.m. No.9242793   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2818 >>2864 >>2940

>>9242766

>>9242661

 

NABU timeline cont.

 

By February, 2016:The FBI kept a permanent agent on board with NABU, just in time for the removal of Shokin.

 

March 29, 2016: https://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/30/world/europe/political-stability-in-the-balance-as-ukraine-ousts-top-prosecutor.html

 

Just days before the Shokin firing, BlueStar Strategies rep. Sally Painter met with Ukraine embassy official in D.C. to seek a meeting with the prosecutor’s office around the time of Joe’s upcoming visit, and was told to wait until the following week. Burisma’s accounting records show payments to BlueStar. [The Hill]

 

Shokin, Ukrainian president Poroshenko's appointment, was blamed for failing in the investigation of a major corruption case and “hindering an investigation into two high-ranking state prosecutors arrested on corruption charges.” Shokin was fired. Biden would later describe this event to the publication, the Atlantic, “Petro, you’re not getting your billion dollars. It’s OK, you can keep the general. Just understand—we’re not paying if you do.” Shokin was soon fired, or he "resigned". The real reason Biden did so however was because of the investigation of Burisma, which would have included an interview with Hunter Biden about financial transfers. Poroshenko ("Petro") at the time was heavily investing in Burisma. Following Shokin’s removel, the investigation was given to NABU (cooperating with Working Group/FBI?), which had been created under the influence of Biden. Guess where that investigation was to go? The first two guesses don't count. Of course, they have denied the investigation was closed, but the arrest warrant of the owner of Burisma would eventually be cancelled, so……Anyhow, despite ole' Uncle Joe making it seem as if he had given "Petro" six hours to decide, this strong arm tactic was employed over an extended period of time that began in 2015, and continuing into 2016. But it makes for a great fireside story telling.

 

Same day, John Buretta, an American lawyer for Burisma Holdings, looked to meet with the Acting Prosecutor General Sevruk about the Burisma investigation, according to email Buretta’s legal team sent the Ukraine embassy in Washington.

 

https://thehill.com/opinion/campaign/463307-solomon-these-once-secret-memos-cast-doubt-on-joe-bidens-ukraine-story

 

Also on this day, Manafort joined Trump's campaign. Ukrainian prosecutor Shokin was formally dismissed in a parliamentary vote, Biden having threatened to withhold funds from Ukraine, because Shokin was investigating Burisma and Hunter Biden.

 

cont.

Anonymous ID: 582242 May 19, 2020, 1:54 p.m. No.9242818   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2864 >>2940

>>9242766

>>9242661

>>9242793

 

NABU timeline cont.

 

May, 2016: NABU and the Ukraine parliamentarian Serhiy Leshchenko,backed by billionaire activist George Soros,published information from the Party of Region’s “black ledger” showing the party spent large sums of money on advertising and services of high state officials. It became a key document implicating Manafort in corruption in Ukraine. In reality, Manafort never took cash, but was paid through wires out of Cyprus–perfectly legit.During the Obama administration, the U.S. Embassy in Kiev worked with the Soros-related groups in opposition research on the Trump campaign.Leshchenko also provided the info about the "black ledger" to Chalupa, who then passed this info on to Michael Isikoff, of Yahoo News. Chalupa also passed the Black Ledger info on to Glenn Simpson at Fusion GPS, who passed them on to staffer Nellie Ohr. It was the news reports both the FBI and later Mueller would include in his Report, despite the FBI and State having been alerted to its veracity and lack of verification. Ukraine’s anti-corruption prosecutor, Nazar Kholodnytskyy, avers he warned State and FBI in the summer of 2016 they considered it a fraud.He had told them:

 

“It was not to be considered a document of Manafort. It was not authenticated. And at that time it should not be used in any way to bring accusations against anybody.”

 

Manafort’s Ukrainian business partner Kilimnik, on information (an informer?) of the State Dept., after seeing the NYT's article in August of 2016 the ledger was fake, said in an August 22 email Manafort:

 

“could not have taken large amounts of cash across three borders. It was always a different arrangement — payments were in wire transfers to his companies, which is not a violation. I have some questions about this black cash stuff because those published records do not make sense. The timeframe doesn’t match anything related to payments made to Manafort. … It does not match my records. All fees Manafort got were wires, not cash.””

 

FBI and Mueller were given copies of Kilimnik’s email. Because FBI regulations prohibit the use of questionable information, the FBI and Mueller avoided listing the actual use of ledger, instead using the Media reports about it, the FBI even assisting in those reports! They used the REPORTS and NOT the ledger itself to obtain a search warrant for Manafort's house in July of 2017, saying in their affidavit:

 

“On Aug. 19, 2016, after public reports regarding connections between Manafort, Ukraine and Russia — including an alleged ‘black ledger’ of off-the-book payments from the Party of Regions to Manafort — Manafort left his post as chairman of the Trump campaign.”

 

They also used these report as "probable cause" to search his bank records:

 

“The April 12, 2017, Associated Press article reported that DMI (Manafort’s company) records showed at least two payments were made to DMI that correspond to payments in the black ledger.”

 

They didn't bother to mention it was WEISSMANN, who would be Mueller's second in the investigation, that had met with the Media a day before the publication of those articles, advising them, something filed by the FBI on April 11, 2017, that the AP (Media):

 

"were advised that they appeared to have a good understanding of Manafort’s business dealings."

 

Furthermore, those AP reporters were connected with Fusion GPS, one of whom, Chad Day, was also associated with Steele.According to the Conservative Tree House:

 

Those AP reporters are almost virtually guaranteed to be the same AP reporters that are participants within the Fusion GPS network; and the same AP reporters who collaborate with Andy Weissmann et al.These endless media scribes were willing participants within the 2015/2016/2017 plot, plan and execution; and as such they are clearly acting/writing to protect themselves and their interests.

 

In reality, Manafort had not received "cash", but had was paid via bank wires through Cyprus, something of which the FBI had been apprised in the 2014 investigation of Manafort and Rick Gates, his firm's partner, for which they had been cleared, according to the FBI's own memos:

 

“Gates stated that the amounts they received would match the amounts they invoiced for services. Gates added they were always paid late, and in tranches,”

 

June 5, 2016:NABU met with U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine, Geoffrey Pyatt to augment their relationship with the FBI.

 

June 30, 2016:NABU and the FBI formalized their relationship, allowing the FBI to keep an onsite office at NABU (more than one agent).

 

October, 2016: Foreign Policy article, What Will Ukraine Do Without Uncle Joe, described Biden's removal of Ukraine’s Shokin. NABU, to whom the entire investigation had been handed after the removal of Shokin, shut it down.

 

cont.

Anonymous ID: 582242 May 19, 2020, 1:57 p.m. No.9242864   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2940

>>9242661

>>9242766

>>9242793

>>9242818

 

NABU timeline cont. pt 5

 

December 15, 2016: Joe Biden phones Ukraine president and prime minister, praising NABU.

 

https://ua.usembassy.gov/readout-vice-president-bidens-calls-president-ukraine-petro-poroshenko-prime-minister-ukraine-volodymyr-groysman/

 

May 9, 2017: Comey fired.

 

June, 2017: Yaroslav Hordiyevych, spokesperson for the Special Anti-Corruption Prosecutor’s office, told the Kyiv Post his agency did not support Leshchenko and the National Anti-Corruption Bureau’s decision to release the information. In the meantime, the working relationship of NABU and the FBI was renewed for two more years.

 

December, 2017:Ukrainian Prosecutor General Yuriy Lutsenko accused NABU of allowing the FBI illegal operations in Ukraine, stating the “U.S. law enforcers were allegedly invited without the permission required and in breach of the necessary procedures,” asking, “Who actually let the foreign special service act in Ukraine?” He therefore tried to audit NABU, however, according to Euromaiden Press, he was unsuccessful “thanks to the reaction from Ukraine’s American partners.” Biden's adviser, Michael Carpenter, warned Lutsenko that “If the Rada votes to dismiss the head of the Anticorruption Committee and the head of the NABU, I will recommend cutting all U.S. government assistance to #Ukraine, including security assistance.”Hmmm, the Deep State still in place is to whom he will made these recommendations.

 

2018:Kostiantyn Kulyk, deputy head of the Prosecutor General’s International Legal Cooperation Department of Ukraine, attempted to get visas to Washington from the U.S. Embassy in Kiev to deliver their evidence of all the previous corruption involving Soros and the Obama administration. However, the ambassador had not given the visas.Kulyk has said:

 

Ukrainian authorities gathered evidence that money paid to an American Democrat allegedly was hidden by Ukraine’s National Anti-Corruption Bureau (NABU) during the 2016 election under pressure from U.S. officials. In the course of this investigation, we found that there was a situation during which influence was exerted on the NABU, so that the name of [the American] would not be mentioned,” he said.

 

December 12, 2018: Ukrainian court ruled Ukrainian parliamentary member Sergey Leschenko and NABU chief Artem Sytnyk publicizing the Manafort black ledger documents in 2016 were an improper foreign intervention in the American presidential election.

 

https://www.kyivpost.com/ukraine-politics/publication-of-manafort-payments-violated-law-interfered-in-us-election-kyiv-court-rules.html

 

February 10, 2019: NABU reopened Burisma case, drafting a notice of suspicion against founder Mykola Zlochevsky, asking special anticorruption prosecutor of Ukraine to bring Zlochevsky in for questioning.

 

https://www.kyivpost.com/ukraine-politics/nabu-prepares-draft-notice-of-suspicion-on-episode-involving-ex-minister-zlochevsky.html

 

May 16, 2019: Artem Sytnyk, head of Ukraine’s National Anticorruption Bureau (NABU), confirmed investigations were open against Burisma and its founder Zlochevsky.

 

https://www.kyivpost.com/ukraine-politics/sytnyk-nabu-has-not-closed-cases-related-to-zlochevsky.html

 

end