>>9241646 (pb)
Not the answer you wanted to hear, I'm sure. Hehe. I'm just glad @POTUS started leaning on the HCQ + Zpack harder. I'm interested to see how many studies disproving the combo are going to be put out there so that big pharma can continue to maintain its stranglehold on cures.
That's not entirely true, but it sure wouldn't be pretty; that's for certain.
Man, you shitheads are getting desperate, arent you?
True. Anons will still tease, though. Always good to have a sense of humor.
That story was talking about other drugs, not HCQ and zpack. Gatewaypundit got that one wrong.
Oh god. Why, oh why. If you're gonna argue with Q, at least be smart enough to stay anon in the process.
Use this one:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1232869/
Not that Fauci would necessarily "know" this in 2005, but he works for NIAID which did this with Canadian grant money:
Acknowledgements
We thank Claudia Chesley and Jonathan Towner for critical reading of the manuscript. This work was supported by a Canadian PENCE grant (T3), CIHR group grant #MGC 64518, and CIHR grant #MGP-44363 (to NGS).
Sorry, let me rephrase.
>Not that Fauci would necessarily "know" this in 2005, but he works for NIAID which did this with Canadian grant money:
Fauci works for NIAID, which is a sub to NIH, which did this with Canadian grant money