>>9248288 (pb)
This is the link from the The Lancet HCQ study if it hasn't been posted yet.
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/laninf/article/PIIS1473-3099(06)70361-9/fulltext
It was archived a month ago though
http://archive.is/r8bBr
Nice digits, but care to elaborate?
I reckon what Facebook does is flag topics or doesn't want widely viewed. So if its anti Trump is OK, but as soon as there's some reasoned argument against it, the original participants will still see it (damage done) but it won't show on anyone else's feed.