So today is 5 20 2020
where are the number dudes to tell us if this is berry berry meaningful.
so we get one of those government holidays this weekend?
the people with jobs in government haven't missed a day of pay this whole time, many of them have been on extended vactation since they got their jobs. They'll be getting full pay on the holiday to do nothing as usual.
is this a real thing or more grooming for psychopaths?
they even give you the derogatory names to use for the victims.
BBC is the ultimate fake-news and cringe.
they create a salacious narrative and then wring their hands wishing it into existence.
young men should know: if you don't get sex it's the way it should be for you.
you're like a rose that hasn't budded.
you're like a caterpillar that hasn't grown it's wings.
What BBC and the cringe svengalis do toyou boys: they seep sex into everything. They taunt you with foolishly promiscuous constant imagery of satyr quality 'sex-creatures' who really aren't the kind who women would choose for husband material . . . or are just presented in a false way.
they stir up all your jearlousy, when you should be working with these other men and teaming with them to do great (non sexual) things.
Instead BBC writes about a grotesque made-up 'type' of 'person' and then gives stereotype names for other ones.
A young man is given all this fake promiscuous view of other people and . . . they are too immature to realize that it's all fakken-ghaaaye.
it starts whenyou are just 8 or 9 years old. They never let up.
And for the boys who the the girls don't want it's a constant stream of subliminals to 'feminize you'.
All in all be what you are. Pick one good person for a spouse. STand by them no matter what when you marry them (and even if you dont' be a faithful friend).
and stop think 'oh he gets sex and I don't'
he also gets disease.
he also gets controlled by the woman
he also screws up his chances with the women who might want to build a life wiht him, who aren't just using him (like the promiscuous girls , we knew them in college, would do).
Fake fake faken-gaahye.
they want you boys to grow up too soon.
Don't believe that everyone is always having sex but you. Why would you want to join in that disese fest anyway? I see a sea of empty headed dreamers lost in a nightmare that hasn't kicked in, alone in the crowd, when I see those seas of faces at the sex-rave. IT's an empty room.
thinking back on my childhood and when the first awareness of a girl who was obvious a 'player' at too young an age . . . I look at that now and remember that I felt like a loser. She didn't pay attention to me at all. And all the boys who she did were the bully kids who lived in the projects part of town. I understand it better now. It was mom squatting there to get free money from the gov, and these were actually cabal kids being groomed to be sex-addict bully people to cuck others. This 10 year old girl was a little seducer but she must have been used by someone because she had a mean streak that she couldn't control. AT times she'd pretned to be nice as if there was a nice person in there, but it was a sock puppet character she could play for a time. They might call such a girl possessed and say it's a Jexibel demon that's got her, but I don't know if she was that depraved because that kind of demon is very very horid and will kill you if it can.
But they are so sweet up front.
so very nice to you when they want to trap you.
So the kids who were the bullies wouldn't let us into their little play-groups. It's clear to me what was really going on, why these kids never bothered to do the work or learn the lessons: they weren't going to need any of it. Their moms and dads had the world under black mail. If she needs someone she visits who ever it was who . . . and blackmails them. They get what they want just by opening up their legs andnever need to learn a damn thing.
and then we end up with this type as our 'civic leaders' later on.
'internet subculture group' : the words that they pull out of BBC lie-stream!
(did I forget a 'v'? No)
I remember that the idea we got from the magazines was that all the kids were having sex at a very young age . . . and we were just left out losers.
we'd watch TV and see it in movies. We'd read about it in the porn rags that we would find in our parents dresser. And then when we got to porn, that was the constant message of that too. And then it was reenforced by a long string of very bad movies out of hollywood whose only purpose for being made, looking back, was as a casting couch or pimping couch for 'actor/sexworker' and their multi-teered pyramid - trap.
The narrative that they spin ' and so we must now censor eveyrone on the internet'
tell any story at all and guide the fake narrative and end it with 'so we must now censor everyone on the internet' and usually you find some control freak 'think-tank' type of overseers group that wants more funding to remain valid.
here is a template that the left uses :
'blah blah blah blahdditty blah blah blah BLAH blah . . . so now we must cede control of . . (insert coveted power or technology) to prevent (insert made up problem).
If shit is so bad that the people can't use the technology without all kind of horrible stuff happening in the etherial narratives of those who schemed to control it all . . . (I give away that I'm trying to expose them . . . oh my) . . . if stuff is so bad, and people are so immoral that . . . some other people are given overseer and censor status . . . then why isn't the same moral failure of the first group also there in the second group of overseers. If there is a problem with something that people cant solve on their own why would a board to 'oversee' some tech be any less susceptible to that problem?
in our case, as societies, the problem is obcession with sexuality which starts at a young age and is used to train people into behaving in a degenerate way to either satisfy urges, or to be in control or have money and stuff, or a place at the rave.
We let the sex-cult kids rule over us because we were too dumb to know that what they were, in their very expensive poses and gloomed over TV scripts, wasn't anything real or anything we could ever be, unless we became one of the sex-cult kids too . . . a bad idea.
and we couldn't ever get there anyway unless we already had a roaded paved to us by bad parents and poison mentors.
"Anywhere but Here" mentality for the mothers. Fathers kicked out.
the narrative is the power.
deflate their hyper narrative.
the augment parts that need to be cooled down. And other things that are important they gloss right over.
Be the one who questions the assumptions that these media-gate-keepers use.
Question the purpose of their narrative.
give them a chance to explain themselves, if possible. Dont' go off into the forests of coo-coo bear and the looly-cringe made up BS from the cringe-dream wake-up not-coffee momentary 'why did I say that' place . . . (when you know as you say it, why am I saying this).
but question their narrative.
Question the cringe.
discect the cringe.
say 'why do you bring it here.
say 'why do you use more than half the content as pejoratives . . . '
say 'why do you always make it about ethnicity'
say 'why do you assume that you are the censor and can decide content'
say 'why do you apply that narrative, what other narrative can we also apply'
discect the cringe and pull out the part that makes it cringe and then see if they are actually onto something real . . . or just spreading more mind-fudge to candify the narrative, to make it easy for people to fall into the drippy mud of bitter and accrimonious condemnation.
the meme doesn't happen when you're not in a meme mood.
the cringe is in the bread and then you say 'coffee must be working I won't post this'
and someone might say 'saying that pre coffee cringe warrorior is a namefag thing to do' and I suppose they would be correct.
Yesterday I let the day pass without much posting past the point of the coffee working.
and if you get to this place you say 'all that I do too is cringe to someone else . . . '
and then do you get to a powerless place of indecision that makes the world say 'ha, we did, we kicked it out of him. Look at him drewling and mueling and puking and being a great big puddle of mud all on his own. We have won. There isn't anything more there to attend to.'
but the real truth with most people is that if they seem that way to the preditors there is a world of something else that they have going on to sustain those needs that real people have to be loved, to feel like part of something worthy, to act posatively, to give to a better future. . .
how does the jexitabliization happen? what do the control crowd people do to throw cold water on that fire?
you know when you reach a certain age not to venture into certain hallways. Bad governance makes all the hallways like that. You can't go into the cave because it's fearful, there are skulls at the entrance, like a sign, saying 'warning warning, danger Danger' and you hear it and want to say a name. and then behind it all is Pudge. She will take your rent check. She will take your tax payment. You have to give her the building permit application along with a sizible hand out to even begin to think to start to build something new . . .
what we need is a lot less Pudge.
Gvvernor pudge, if you would only
share your fudge
maybe your wouldn't be a hulk
with too much bulk
breaking the stage,
making scafolding collapse,
and bringing fear
to the old wooden staircases.
how dare you make fun of how fat he is ! ! !
All we ever wanted was for the Pudge to share the fudge.
In contracting, and in business, you can asseccess the situation by looking art those with whom you deal and stee the 'pudge' factor. Whatever percentage of the project that will be syphoned off in graft. It's a reality of actual contracting to ascertain that situation and realize that The Pudge wants it Fudge.
and you can't stop it from happening in the real world if you are in that game so you budget it in (off budget) in your mind with what might be seen as . . . graft . . . by overseers.
and then you say 'OK, maybe I'll get out of the business.'
oh no, but then you need to move from that place you like that has those Tuscan Fringes.
So then you look to the architectural style of graft and see how the various forms of traditional architecture are . . . pushed to new places to make other streams of graft which 'socially seeing' daught-org grifters can syphin out of the building budget 'so much must be for 'art'' and we say what that is. and they say it's surplus metal tubes that they pay someone to weld together and tehy dump it in the middle of what they call 'the towers' and that's their little grift place where they have appartments and don't pay property tax . . . It's a university.
So if you see it you see the neo-fudgicle quality of that sort of architecture: the design is such to allow the looting off of most of what is budgetted to the project for needless and very inexpensive fake flurishes of 'art'.
I suppose we can sarcastically call that style of architecture and governance 'NeoFudgical'
and we end up with NeoFudgeical architecture and Neofudgicle Governance
it's the ethos of 'more fudge for the pudge'
or "if it's free, it's mee"
or
Cha cha cha at the free shrimp jamboree, vote by mail, don't even live in state, and party harty in cnetral florida meanwhile . . . governor pudge is ruling the slaves back home . . .
neofudgical demogratic governance of pudgefactor cringe
the new demografts
NOTABLE