>>9251530 (lb)
>>9251550 (lb)
Question is, who wrote it?
https://www.justsecurity.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/420379775-fbi-conspiracy-theories-domestic-extremism.pdf
https://www.fbi.gov/contact-us/field-offices/phoenix
>>9251619 (lb)
The question you need to ask yourself, anon, is are those 44 Highly classified operations a part of the CLAS 1-99 Q keeps bringing up, or are they other programs outside of that?
https://qanon.pub/#3952
And if you don't think even Q uses hyperbole (1%, 99%) you'd be kidding yourself. Taking things too literally can cause a person to miss the point entirely. If 70% of the FBI is good, and 30% is bad, would you want to crush the morale of the 70% to the point of inaction and collecting a gov't paycheck?
Prime example:
Look at law enforcement in the current environment of COVID-19 panic, and Governors edicts. Some are enforcing them, and some aren't. Some are awake, and some still asleep.
Saying 99% of a certain group are "X" instead of "Y" is hyperbole. But anons are smart enough to go along with it because many of those agents are people with emotions, too. Better to keep morale going than to crush it with something that might make the situation seem more bleak.
Hannity'll cover it, or Laura. Tucker might lend a "Somebody come look at this", too.