>>9252623
Do anons have to be a TV station, a newspaper, a formal news website, etc. to become credible?
Do we have to form a company with a board of directors and shareholders to be seen as credible?
Do we have to present the facts in a format that normies are used to?
Will true info presented via social media EVER be credible to the majority?
Is the problem one of content, style, timing, channel selection…
Is the problem related to the constant dilution of our efforts by shills?
Do we have to put out a newsletter?
A newspaper?
A website controlled by an editorial board that is capable of excluding shill content?
If our efforts are not working then we need to do something different…
What is our process to assess if it's working?
What data and metrics do we use?
Do we discuss them here where the entire world can see our discussions and counteract them?
Frustrated