last bread baker baked notables, and then deleted them.
>>9258373 lb
>>9258540 lb
cannot see any reason why this should not be baked and get more eyes on - especially in a bread with very few notables collected.
anons like bakers. anons don´t like gatekeepers.
all lb:
>>9258031, >>9258056 Q drops with upcoming 2 yr delta - FLOOD COMING?
>>9257899 USMC tweets "down" and "55" right after 8kun is down
So first I thought Q refered to C_A, bc of "central".
But this definitly fit´s GCHQ nicely.
>What [central] AB[C] agency played quarterback?
>Q
>
>
>
>Q
G
C
H
Q
https://theintercept.com/2014/04/30/gchq-prism-nsa-fisa-unsupervised-access-snowden/
shills out in full force?
muh jew, riot shills, namefagging clowns, ridiculous bs, disinfo and now also the most glowing of all shills?
you seem butthurt much.
I posted info. baker baked it. then shills [you] attacked. you attacked my personally with lies bc clearly you cannot find a reason why the two mentioned notables should not get eyes on. then baker took it out.
cannot see how that would make me appear bad in any way.
but imo it does not make you or lb baker look based.
generally a baker should not try to leave out relevant info.
simple as that.
USMC tweet with "down" and "55" right after 8kun went down is an insta notable.
no based baker would ever leave that out, or take it out again after heh baked it. no way.
baker,
you seriously need anons saying yay or nay to this?
why not just use common sense and do what bakers are supposed to do?
you maybe wait for more shills than anons replying and having a reason to leave it out?
seriously, why would you not want any more eyes on? why even ask?
does really not seem like you would want to help anons.
w/o you adding any sauce/proof, it prolly is as much debunked as Hillary emails.
I baked that, and I am not a baker.
When it was posted, there was an actual (tor) bread baked already, so I posted the link to the actual bread.
other than that, catalogue seems pretty fine (some shill breads as always)
NEWFAGS, LURKERS,
As Q told in many posts the anons on Q Research and the whole Q movement are a DIRECT THREAT to the wordwide deep state.
Shills are here in full force and apply all kind of tactics, most of them have it´s base on "divide and rule":
Attack people of the Q patriots and sow division to weaken the movement.
Some shilly try to blend in as anons and have fake conversations.
>TOGETHER YOU ARE STRONG.
>DIVIDED YOU ARE WEAK.
Shills attack the loud voices on YT and on TV.
Shills attack individual anons and call them names (boomer, kike, …).
Shills are desperate bc anons and patriots ww are so many and are so strongly bound in the fight against evil.
Shills still try to sow division and try to paint this board nazi to enable fake news attacks on "Q nazis". Shills now even post fake memes that look like from Garrison - desperation.
Shills also try to deflect from the [cult] by muh jew spam.
Shills spread stupid info and post utter bs to make anons look ridiculous.
One shill calls everyone "bot" and want´s you to think that there are not thousands of anons contributing and millions of lurkers spreading info on other channels.
Another shill posts anime and wolf memes all the time to make researching autists look ridiculous at first glance.
Shills attack relevant info (was noted two months ago, why should anons care, not relevant, …).
Shills try to divide anons by making them leave to a board that Q chooses not to post on (QRB, 4chan).
Shills post disinfo and cryptic bs to slide.
Shills try to namefag to 'establish a trustworty character' (A, CTA, McT, …)
Shills attack the Qclock (that Q asked anons to build and that works amazingly well: "future proves past")
Shills post clown accounts from twatter who larp as Q insiders.
…
Shills glow if you regard the posts made here in the context of ALL Q DROPS.
(And in some breads it´s 70, 80, 90% shill posts.)
Watch out for clown bakers that leave out and ignore relevant info or push shill topics (slides, muh jew).
Godspeed.
shill, you spamming that bs is more ridiculous than this shill
read the OP of every bread:
>We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here.
Baker,
got notables?
so do you think this would confirm that no anons would consider USMC tweeting "down" and "55" right after 8kun went down relevant/related?
does it maybe confirm the huge efforts of the deep state shills attacking - while trying to blend in as anons?
you really think nobody realizes that in a bread with muh jew propaganda and riot shills attacking?
anons don´t namefag.
only shills do, hoping to be able to create a 'known' character to shill with later.
failing since many months.