>discernment between positive and negative ET groups
In my experience truly positive entities (not negative ones pretending) either respond neutrally or not at all towards attempts to offend or provoke them to action. Neither positive nor negative, reacting in those ways would alter the balance of the situation.
>Here are twats of Kabamur claiming to be Q.
Except in every image you posted he refers to Q as an being separate from himself that he supposedly works in tandem with.
At best he claims to be relaying messages given to him by Q.
I don't see how you go from that to "claiming to be Q."
>He is also saying that the current Q is not actually Q.
There is no singular "Q," it is a group. The idea that any one individual is "actually Q" does not make sense.
>odd thing for Q to reply to.
>Friends in high places? Or just a glitch?
Q is the one who linked to the original video twat.
They already knew it was there.
Message, reply, confirm.
Three step process.