>>9726431

>the truth about ET contact

Which you definitely do not appear to know. Why are you still advertising the fact you're a shill for Dr. Grier? Do you really think after all these years of bread hogging self-fellatio that anons are going to follow you? Don't you know he is connected to evil like the Podestas, Rockefellers and Clinton's? Don't you know he is an outright liar telling people that negative ET does not exist? Do you really believe that spamming these threads full of ce5 garbage that anons are going to look up to you as a trusted source? You're such a raging disinformation famefaggot. Just post another hundred times, that'll make anons believe you.

>>9727686

Can't say I'm surprised to see that pop up immediately after calling out grier shill. Not like that hasn't happened for the past three years on here. You do realize every time you do this it proves you are babysitting these threads? It also proves you are using different devices to control the conversation here and make it look like anons are supporting you. Talking about yourself in the third person with a secondary device immediately after getting called out is a repeated pattern, dozens and dozens of times this has occurred. Posting disinformation and fake videos right from the beginning. You'd be smart to adapt your playbook to try to sell your trash.

>providing the flak because he's over the target.

You have also used this exact phrase many times on here. Funny thing is, it only seems to pop up when grier shill is questioned. Only by new IPs or IPs that vehemently support the ce5/griershill that posts on here. Seriously man you need to work on your tells, you make it too obvious every time that it's you.