Riddle me this:

Q initially didn't post about Corona

DJT goes ham and closes border to china before it is recommended.

Dems say it is safe with Pelosi going to china town, along with all of the media saying it is over-hyped.

Now Dems say DJT didn't do enough initially or since then.

Q finally speaks of it and says it is over-hyped.

DJT now retweets how Sweden has been struggling without locking down their country.

What the hell am I missing?

First bad(DJT) and not bad(Dems & Media), now not bad(Q), and worse than expected(Dems & Media), still bad but not as bad(DJT).

Seriously Anons, help me out here. The number don’t justify either side of this crazy shit. Either it is worse than they say or it is not. What is with all the flippy-flop on both sides?

>>9261998

No Fake News, don't watch. Work for essential service, and am out there part-time. Not talking if real or fake, obviously real.

Talking of why DJT pushed real vs. Dem/Media Fake in initial onslaught of potential virus.

Why does Q now talk of over-reaction to virus? Would DJT have just not initially not overreacted?

Not saying one is wrong or the other, or lost faith in DJT, but what is the reason that DJT pushed for closed borders, and now Q says it is all over-hyped?

>>9262012

My thought too, but why, oh why is it now an over-hyped thing. Q specifically says over-hyped.

Not talking real or fake, but the facts don't line up the way I see.

Followed Q a long time, first time I can't justify the differences between Q and DJT.

What are we missing?