why don't you say 'marxists pretending to be islamic' in America?
it bothers me more that an imperious person who bought her way into a place of power (just a guess, no sauce) would think she's the queen and can say who can and can not go to her state. If he broke a law, issue a citation. He's still welcome in your state, your imperious burghar.
She thinks she's a kind of nobility now. Her family bought her the job for seat of power, and she's going tell everyone what ta do.
I can channel it: ivy leauge buy in. Connection to relatives from Ukraine either them or inlaws . . .
brother that 'died' but some say he was a tranny and replaced her . . . (no wait that is someone else)
she's a self parody. What do I need to know?
she had a D on her. That means 'demon'.
she's a possessed Jexibel or she wouldn't be allowed to be a lower levl scoffing sub-adjunct in charge of pandering and bullying.
All I kneed to know about her is how she talks about if or if not people, especially beloved presidents, can come to 'her' state. and totally unsauced: she's not even born in the USA
everything I say is speculation and I made it up in my head. but I bet I'm dead on about some of it.
considering that the crime of 'buying in' for a student is so well known, and prevalant, I think her being made an example of mandates that she get a less sentence because the neglect of the enforcemnt of law created a defacto traditin of 'getting away with it,' in the case of paying for admission. This is well documented in movies and comedies, made in Hollywood and elsewhere. Culturally what she did is considered 'good' becuase she did it to help her children who are forced to compete in a broken system and what happened to her was a 'shake down' because if you can pay full tuition why shouldn't they just let you into the school? Well why not? So they can let some marxist kid from Ukraine pretending to be a minority from somewhere else go for free as a dreamer?
it's an admission by the courts of the neglect of the statute by past administrations. I think it's fair. It sends a message, but it doesn't ruin people's lives too badly. She doesn't even deserve a day in jail. The law is voided due to three generations of the legal profession ignoring it. It's like 'chewing gum on a Sunday' in that sense.
sorry, not that I want that. It's just a fact.
The university system is broken, run by a disreputible class of gate keepers, but they do hold the key to jobs and success for those of us who aren't 'in the family'.
and if they like you they let you be a slave for a while.
She was being hussled. She just took the path of least resistence.
all to promote excellence and scholarship.
the solution is simple: antitrust the universities and bust them back up into individual colleges.
make the 'land trust' aspects of housing taxable, and take away their special status as tax free place for old wealth to larp as feudal lords.
Anti trust them. Hold them up to the ideals upon which their institutions were founded. Make them be noble instead of feudal.