>>9271453

Baker,

lb you baked those below posts.

but you gave it a name that did not at all show the meaning of the post.

this is basically hiding the info and making it a lot harder for anons to catch it and search for it.

name baker gave it:

>>9271238 (lb), >>9271183 (lb) New DJT rts New Scavino

name I suggested lb.

>>9271183 (lb), >>9271238 (lb) Navy vid rt by POTUS and Dan Scavino → Q326 "JUSTICE"?

lb I asked baker to change it.

>>9271381

baker did not make this super quick change lb, but replied with this - why??

>>9271437 lb

I replied this

>>9271450 lb

baker then made two notables out of it, again with out mentioning the actual meaning of the drop.

>>9271485

>anon says Q326 re US Navy tweet ?

this is not a great title, it will keep anons from catching the meaning quick.

cannot see any reason why baker would not just have found/taken a name that actually describes what the post says:

POTUS and Dan rt the same vid. This vid seems to point to Q326, which points to "JUSTICE".

Again asking baker to change to suggested title or any other title that gives the full and actual meaning of the post.

>>9271534

>POTUS and Dan rt the same vid. This vid seems to point to Q326, which points to "JUSTICE".

almost forgot: POTUS also tweeted "JUSTICE" (just like in Q326) minutes after!

this obviously is connected and should be baked showing that.

>>9271183 (lb), >>9271238 (lb) Navy vid rt by POTUS and Dan Scavino → Q326 "JUSTICE"?

also this:

upcoming 2 year deltas saying

>DECLAS

>'Flood is coming'

>It's happening.

pretty interdasting I´d say.

>>9271567

so baker bakes it in a shilly way and now shills attack with lies?

obviously POTUS and Dan tweeted the same US Navy vid.

over the target.

eyes on:

>>9271534

>>9271588

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1263641602435751937

>>9271601

might be. I don´t go with [C]orney anymore, imo [C]orona or something else, like e.g. [C]onfirmation.

>>9271809

ok, now I realize that the ID attacking with a straigh out lie is actually the baker.

>>9271567

>>9271453

Why did you give the notable a name that does not at all show the meaning?

Why try to hide it?

Why not taking a suggested title that shows the real meaning?

Why making another shill move instead?

And why then attack with a lie and claim Dan did not rt this vid???

Such a baker is not here to help.

BO, you lurking?

Anond don´t like gatekeeping and lying clowns.

Please member this IP and keep him from baking, thanks.

>>9271775

interdasting indeed.

I´d call it notable, but with a clown baking I rather repost the shit out of it later.

God bless, anon.

>>9271945

bakers serve anons.

bakers are no authority to anons.

and baker sure as fuck are no gatekeepter to anons.

if you want to help, great.

if you shill and lie, GTFO.

BO, keep this clown from baking please.

>>9272038

baker,

you know very well that I posted this, showing a rt of a Navy vid by both Dan and POTUS.

this is the first post I made, the one you baked (but with a shilly title hiding the info.)

>>9271183 (lb), >>9271238 (lb) Navy vid rt by POTUS and Dan Scavino → Q326 "JUSTICE"?

[you] gave the notable a shilly name hiding the info.

I asked you to give it a name that actually helps anons catch the meaning.

you did not, but did another shill move.

and this bread you claimed Dan didn´t even rt it.

I replied with this, the pics of the post you baked before, the pics showing Dan did rt it and you lie

>>9271588

what did you do? you kept lying and just claiming the opposite.

and now, be being called out as the clown you are, you threaten anons with taking out the info completely?

seriously?

BO, keep this clown from baking.

and it doesn´t really matter if you take out the info, as you baked it in a shilly way anyway.

will wait for a based baker and repost it.

thanks for playing.

consider breaking free, seems like GO TIME and seems like you would have to repent and make sure you don´t belong to the [1%] quickly.

>>9271999

so would a based BO do that?

it´s BOs decision to keep an obvious clown from baking, but it´s not BO´s decision if he will be perceived based.