To fellow digital soldiers-

Out in the trenches of Twattersphere you can begin to see a potential spin to the release of the Flynn-Kislyek transcript form. Goes like this:

Yeah, the 302 (or transcript, when released) didn't mention sanctions, but it mentioned expulsions. Expulsions are the same as sanctions since they were done in response to an action. This is an idiotic and desperate position to cling to for multiple reasons:

1) Sanctions are official; they require an act of Congress if they impose real economic penalties, such as those placed on Russia.

2) Expulsions are at the discretion of the President, do not constitute official policy with respect to diplomacy (for example, diplomats could be expelled for feeling up a secretary).

3) Explusions and sanctions were separate events, consequently.

4) It destroys credulity to assume that FBI agents would discuss "sanctions" with Flynn when they really meant the expulsions, or vice versa. Anybody in Flynn's position and with his background would no the difference, and so would any of the FBI agents.

Just a friendly FYI. Be ready to smash this argument. It's coming.

Fox News just reported that Wray has ordered an internal review of the Michael Flynn investigation.

Make of what you will…

>>9278906

Westboro Baptist Church - Clown Op

>>9279004

When I'm near the end I wanna go there.

>>9279019

Yes and No. Or perhaps maybe.

Grenell says they're coming but he also noted that not all the transcripts were under the control of the DNI. This is instructive, and jives with what Bongino and others have pointed out - that the call was not collected under NSA surveillence umbrella, and was a product of the FBI.

So if the call was a product of FBI activity, then that's a HUGE red flag because there was no criminal warrant. Means there was a FISA or more likely cooperation with foreign intelligence services, as Q has all but confirmed.

And remember, the fact that the FBI hasn't released could also be the saving grace for Wray, because if the DOJ is investigating the leak of its contents, then Wray would be precluded from releasing it since it is evidence in that investigation.

Buckle up, anons!

>>9279127

IF the DOJ is investigating the leak of the Flynn call and IF the transcript was under the control of the FBI, then this means that said criminal leak investigation is likely over, and probably involved someone at the FBI. With that investigation over, Wray is cleared to do internal review, which, if you talk to FBI people, is NOT a walk-in-the-park. These reviews are generally feared by field offices.

Trust Wray? Maybe…

O shit we need Biden in a cavalier hat.

>>9279270

Was thinking more like this