>>9280006 (pb)

>>9281175

Agree. She didn’t ask them to dig and research, but she did use the word “follow up”.

She Schooled them ALL and the whah-whah-ing has started in a big way already!

> To me, this opens up a whole new dialogue and possible narrative.

Did the OAN news reporter toss her the question, in a pre-planned fashion.

Either way, watching it live made me feel quite joyous for an Anon who has been here from day one and did the diggz on some major stuff over the years.

It’s the same perspective when Twitterfags started reusing a lot of my qresearch.

NEW FRONT Channel for the cause!

>>9281185

>>9281144

That’s the way I understand it. Recently completed the annual training in Classification Authority, Derivative Classification Markings, etc. Which is somewhat similar to the NSA and DoE that I recall from the mid 90s.

>>9281333

Haha, love it!

Headline: Press Secretary guilty of directly Leaking Questions to the Press

Byline: Press Unduly Constrained By White House…No Longer Free to Question

>MemeFags…some good fodder for you.

>Treason with a Reason

>>9280999

>>9281006

(Q)uestion: How do You get permission or get around the character limits on the post?

>Board Volunteer status?

>Other?

>>9281006

So Anon, already familiar with most of the materials posted (SOs, ACSC, Maxwell, etc., plus DHS and more).

Clarify the motivation and method for us Anon Frens of a regular flavor.

>Mid Channel Comms with a twist?