>>9281210 pb

>>9281241 pb

If this isn't a case of "Trust Sessions" turning out to be disinfo,

I assume it's about optics and emphasizing that the coming justice is not an R. vs D. matter, or about Trump vs [Them], but it is about the law. Justice vs crime.

>POTUS must isolate himself to prevent negative optics. (Q 2)

>It must be compelling to avoid a divide (political attack/optics). (Q 1644)

>What critical 'mission' did SESSIONS publicly announce re: leaks?

>Why did SESSIONS make this PUBLIC?

>Optics are important.

>Control of the NARRATIVE.

(Q 2643)

>Optics are important.

>When are optics not important?

>If the 'stage' is clean, can the performance begin?

>How might 'transparency' [DECLAS] fit into the dialogue?

Q 2937

>IMPORTANCE OF PARTISAN OPTICS?

>Who was SESSIONS' CHIEF OF STAFF?

>Laser designator(s) locked on target(s)

>Who was assigned directly to SESSIONS by POTUS?

(Q 2462)

>Optics are meaningful.

>Re_read (again).

>Slowly & carefully.

>http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/03/31/turley-sessions-using-utah-federal-prosecutor-much-better-trump-2nd-special-counsel

(Q 1453)

>Important to Remember:

>POTUS already ordered the DECLAS (per Q-proof Sep 17).

>He's awaiting the DOJ IG (now Barr + OIG) to proceed w/ the order.

>Optics are important.

(Q 2930)

WHO HAS FULL CONTROL?

OPTICS ARE VERY IMPORTANT.

(Q 3177)