Dayum
Notableas anything could be.
Careful. You risk turning the kitchen into an exclusive club. This would be okay if our enemy wasn't so good at infiltrating exclusive clubs. And if you are too good at (apparently) excluding shills from the kitchen then anons will develop a dangerous sense of Trust in bakers. This will weaken their psychological immune systems and turn them back into sheep.
The main reason why this movement has survived so long is the glorious Chaos and well-honed sense of discernment that comes from having to suspiciously scrutinize everything. If we lose that then this may become an organization that can be taken over by infiltrators. Our best immunity is to not become too organized.
>what are they hiding?
>did they fudge numbers?
They looked at real-world data and noticed that people who were given HCQ we're more likely to die than those who weren't. This was because HCQ is still experimental and tends to be given to people who are already in bad, bad shape.
So if you give HCQ to people who already have one foot in that grave and don't give it to minimally symptomatic people, then you shouldn't be surprised if that almost-dead people die more than the pretty-okay people.
I'm looking for sauce for that "20% injury rate" claim. Can't find it.
There is nothing there. It's an Robert F Kennedy Jr piece. And his link does not match what he is claiming. Pics related. Their standard for "grade 3" doesn't sound consistent with his second link meant to explain what is meant by these grades.